Critics might say that smart phones in the classroom cause too many distractions. A 2009 article in Education Magazine made just
such a claim. Although cell phones can certainly cause distractions, current research suggests that teachers and students are putting phones to better use. A 2013 Educator Insider poll reveals that 67% of high school instructors now encourage students to use phones in the classroom setting. Students without phones are actually at a disadvantage in the classroom. The poll lists Internet access, spell checks, and collaboration as three key uses of smart phones in an educational setting. How does the author handle the counterclaim?
The author chooses to concede the point and offers no rebuttal.
The author offers an opinion discounting the counterclaim.
The author ignores the counterclaim and avoids responding.
The author supplies a rebuttal that quotes more current research.
I think thew answer is D. "The author supplies the rubuttel that quotes more current research". I'm not 100% sure but it was the best one i could think of. Hope it's right
Answer: the correct answer is the author supplies a rebuttal that quotes more current research.
Explanation: the author says: "... Although cell phones can certainly cause distractions, current research suggests that teachers and students are putting phones to better use ...", meaning cell phones cause problems but they can be helpful.
It is irony because war is anything but kind. Alliteration would be if both words started with the same letter. Style is not a device, and a simile is when you compare something to something.
Limiting yourself also ruins your productivity. But once you let go of that, you'll actually get to work more often and will be more focused (instead of procrastinating, thinking you'll fail, or having doubts). The results will be great too and soon other people will start noticing it.
