Answer:The Wilmot Proviso was an unsuccessful 1846 proposal in the United States Congress to ban slavery in territory acquired from Mexico in the Mexican–American War. ... Sectional political disputes over slavery in the Southwest continued until the Compromise of 1850.
Explanation:
The Wilmot Proviso was an unsuccessful 1846 proposal in the United States Congress to ban slavery in territory acquired from Mexico in the Mexican–American War. ... Sectional political disputes over slavery in the Southwest continued until the Compromise of 1850.
The study of social sciences in classrooms helps to understand important issues in today's society, such as globalization and cultural diversity.
<h3 /><h3>Why is it important to study social sciences?</h3>
Through a scientific methodology, there is an increase in the understanding of aspects that form society and its customs, such as religion, politics and technology.
The ubuntu philosophy, for example, is a relevant topic for understanding the importance of collectivity in a multicultural society, where there are several different cultures interacting.
Therefore, the education professional must relate the concepts of social sciences with modern society and its characteristics, instituting critical thinking and the student's cognitive and social development.
Find out more about social sciences here:
brainly.com/question/17980367
#SPJ1
Answer:
D. Owls.
Explanation:
In a food chain, the secondary consumer is one who feeds on the animal that feeds on the producer.
By looking at the food chain shown in the question above, we can see that the producer is the blueberry bush, which will be consumed by the mice. The mice had served as food for the owl, which had served as food for the bobcat.
As you can see above, mice are the primary consumer that feeds on the producer, the owl, therefore, is the secondary consumer since it feeds on mice.
Most owners are familiar with this delivery method where each stage follows the others in a linear progression with no overlap. After securing the services of an architect, who reports directly to the owner, plans and specifications will be drafted, and then contractors will bid for the project. The lowest responsive, responsive bidder is awarded the project, which progress exactly as designed.
Advantages:
Being a familiar method, Competitive Bid projects are an easier sell, and they're easier to manage because the scopes and stages are rigidly defined. Because the design team and contractor both report to the owner, the owner has a greater degree of control over the process. As the name suggests, the bidding process typically results in the best price.
Disadvantages:
While the Competitive Bidding elicits low bids, the coast of a design is not determined until the bids are receieved. This could mean that a redesign is required if the bids exceed the budget, and because time is a financial factor, cost estimates can change during the design process. Th fragmented approach can also cause more finger-pointing between parities, since the contractor is not able to give advice during the design, budget, or project planning phases. Finally, the linear schedule makes this the slowest of the three methods
