1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
8090 [49]
3 years ago
9

According to engel's confession, what were the central goals the communists, and how did they aim to achieve them

History
1 answer:
Nady [450]3 years ago
5 0
The central aim of the communists was to reconstruct a society so that there would be a complete freedom in developing and exercising all of his powers and capabilities as a member of the society.

This can only be achieved by abolishing private ownership and replacing it with more or less community-based ownership of properties or more specifically government-based ownership of properties.
You might be interested in
What is step 10 in this proof?
SVEN [57.7K]
Step 10 in what? is there a image attached to this question??
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question 12 (Worth 5 points)
ExtremeBDS [4]
The freedman's bureau distributing supplies

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why does every government decision cost something?
BabaBlast [244]
Think about the idea here and you'll see how the idea of "cost" is inevitable in every decision.  (It's true not just of governments, but of our own decisions too -- but we'll focus on governments here.)

Let's say the government decides it wants all citizens to have access to health care.  Well, that's going to cost dollars to pay for that health care.  Where will those dollars come from?

Let's say the government decides, in response to school shootings or other acts of gun violence, to ban certain types of guns or ammunition.  That costs something to the gun dealers who were making money off those sales (and they'll object).  Or let's say the government decides to do further and deeper background checks on all gun buyers.  Well, that will cost something in terms of personnel and processes to accomplish all the background checks.  Or let's say the government decides to increase mental health screenings and treatment because persons with mental illness issues may become violent and dangerous to society.  That will cost much in order to organize and carry out better mental health intervention across the country.

I focused on just a couple issues there (health care, gun control).  But the same principle holds on anything government does.  You can think about your own examples that you'd want to use.  Anything the government decides to do comes with some sort of costs attached.  That doesn't mean it's bad to make such decisions -- it just means we need to count the cost and invest our efforts where they will have the best benefit.
3 0
3 years ago
Select the correct text in the passage.
JulijaS [17]

<u>This portion of the text shows Hobbes supported an absolute ruler:</u>

  • <em>Men are continually in competition for honour and dignity . . . and consequently amongst men there ariseth on that ground, envy, and hatred, and finally war. ... No wonder if there be somewhat else required, besides [contract], to make their agreement constant and lasting; which is a common power to keep them in awe and to direct their actions to the common benefit. </em>
  • <em> The only way to erect such a common power, as may be able to defend them from the invasion of foreigners, and the injuries of one another . . . is to confer all their power and strength upon one man, or upon one assembly of men, that may reduce all their wills, by plurality of voices, unto one will.</em>

Further detail:

Thomas Hobbes published a famous work called Leviathan in 1651.  The title "Leviathan" comes from a biblical word for a great and mighty beast.  Hobbes believed government is formed by people for the sake of their personal security and stability in society.  In Hobbes' view, once the people put a king (or other leader in power), then that leader needs to have supreme power (like a great and mighty beast).    Hobbes' view of the natural state of human beings without a government held that people are too divided and too volatile as individuals -- everyone looking out for his own interests.  So for security and stability, authority and the power of the law needs to be in the hands of a powerful ruler like a king or queen.  And so people willingly enter a "social contract" in which they live under a government that provides stability and security for society.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Estimate the coordinates for the southern tip of africa
Anon25 [30]
30degree s  30 degree e
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Fill in the blank.<br> po is a signed and approved agreement between nations.
    12·1 answer
  • What features of politics in ancient Athens would be familiar to Americans today?
    15·1 answer
  • To be a great india power you have to:
    7·2 answers
  • 5 coworkers are having lunch and have decided to split the bill evenly the sum 1.95 + 1.95 + 7.95 + 8.95 + 11.25 + 10.95 + 1125
    7·1 answer
  • Whose ideas on government did not help inspire the French people to revolution in 1789? A. John Locke B. Thomas Jefferson C. Kar
    5·2 answers
  • What is the correct definition of Horizontal Integtaion?
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following most inspired the inclusion in the Declaration of Independence of the right of the people to revolt again
    9·2 answers
  • Question 1 of 10
    6·1 answer
  • Queen Latifah had success in which of the following professions?
    6·1 answer
  • Most significantly the _ (Name
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!