Answer:
C
Explanation:
slavery would not be solved until war happened - the only solution to such a dividing conflict as this
The Head teacher is the head of the school and the teacher is just a faculty.
<h3>The literal meaning of teacher and head teacher. </h3>
The Head teacher is the most senior teacher in a school and is responsible for its management and administration.
The teacher is a part of the teaching group and has to take lectures and teach students.
<u> Differences between a teacher and a head teacher in points. </u>
- A headteacher is the school's principal whereas a teacher is only a part of the teaching staff.
- A headteacher has the authority to establish regulations and revolutionize the school, but a teacher does not.
- No one can question if the headteacher breaks the regulation, but if a teacher does, he is reprimanded by the headteacher and may be dismissed.
- The Headteacher has full authority to dismiss or appoint a teacher.
- A teacher is not all-encompassing, but a headteacher is.
To learn more about the headteacher refer to:
brainly.com/question/15190145
#SPJ2
I believe it's D because the U.S. was in a depression after World War 1 and could not help Germany anymore which caused the rise of Hitler
The French Revolution was a period in France when the people overthrew the monarchy and took control of the government. The Revolution began in 1789 and ended in the late 1790s. Before the French Revolution started, the people of French were divided into social groups or “Estates”.
Dred Scott decision, formally <span>Dred Scott v. John F.A. Sandford</span>, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 6, 1857, ruled (7–2) that a slave (Dred Scott) who had resided in a free state and territory (where slavery was prohibited) was not thereby entitled to his freedom; that African Americans were not and could never be citizens of the United States; and that the Missouri Compromise (1820), which had declared free all territories west of Missouri and north of latitude 36°30′, was unconstitutional. The decision added fuel to the sectional controversy and pushed the country closer to civil war.
Among constitutional scholars, Scott v. Sandford is widely considered the worst decision ever rendered by the Supreme Court. It has been cited in particular as the most egregious example in the court’s history of wrongly imposing a judicial solution on a political problem. A later chief justice, Charles Evans Hughes, famously characterized the decision as the court’s great “self-inflicted wound.”
