Answer: <u>Critical thinkers</u> are leaders who use generic or ad hoc methods, in an orderly manner, for finding solutions to problems; this is often a process that leads to skills that can be learned, mastered and used and can result in reasoned conclusions based on a reasoned process.
Explanation: Institutional problems have their own nuances and are not of the same kind every single time. Hence, leaders need to handle problems wittily in order to assure the flawless functioning of the institution in which they hold responsible positions. Unconventional problems need out of the box solutions. Only a leader who has the ability to think critically about the nuances of the problem can come up with pertinent methods to solve such problems.
To produce goods and services
<span>The purpose of firms is to utilize factors of production,
which include capital, land, labor and technology in order to provide a demanded or needed
product and service. A firm is usually profit making, they provide a vehicle
for capital growth as well, which also provide a vehicle for savings growth,
and create wealth</span>
Answer:
the deondologist would believe that the actions of human rights defenders are contradictory and incorrect.
Explanation:
A deotologist is a person who follows a philosophy that believes that the duties and rights of human beings are directly related to their duty and moral obligation. Based on this, they believe that human beings need to consider what is morally correct to guide their actions.
For this reason, we can consider that a deotologist would support human rights defenders to carry out peaceful protests, but would find it highly contradictory and incorrect for them to violate civil laws that they consider unjust, because this is behavior outside of morality.
I think it is Europe's overseas colonies and dominions were brought into the war, by providing troops, laborers, supplies, and also German colonies were overran by the Allies, bringing them into the war.
Marbury v.madison gave the uns. supreme Court the power of judical review
