6 I think is one you can say
Answer:
The sample size is too small
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer is the last one: the sample size is too small. Since we only got 3 subjects to test, maybe one of them could live for a long time after the diagnosis of Cacer and that made the average survival time go up by a lot.
In order to obtain results with a significance level higher, you need a sample size of at least 20 subjects.
Now lets see why other options wouldnt be good answers:
- For a small amount of subjects, it is unlikely to have errors in caculation
- The sample size is given
- We are not given information about the treatment and we dont even know if the subjects feel more confident with the new treatment. Also, if a Placebo effect works regularly, it shouldnt limit statistical sifgnificance
- An increase in 2 years is huge in comparison with the previous survival time.
Answer:
f = 4n
f = n+27
Fred is 36 years old and Nathan is 9 years old.
n = 9
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
i think its b cause it states it in the math problem and other things
Step-by-step explanation:
#3 3.4w-0.4w+4.6w+5=-7.6
8.2w+5=-7.6
8.2w=-7.6-5
8.2w=-12.6
W=-12.6÷8.2
W=-1.53658 I'm working on otherc2
