Answer:
b. Hannah is likely to be incorrect because 9 is not contained in the interval.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello!
Hannah estimated per CI the difference between the average time that people spend outside in southern states and the average time people spend outside in northern states.
The CI is a method of estimation of population parameters that propose a range of possible values for them. The confidence level you use to construct the interval can be interpreted as, if you were to calculate 100 confidence interval, you'd expect that 99 of them will contain the true value of the parameter of interest.
In this example, the 99%CI resulted [0.4;8.0]hs
Meaning that with a 99% confidence level you'd expect the value of the difference between the average time people from southern states spend outside than the average time people from northern states spend outside is included in the interval [0.4;8.0]hs.
Now, she claims that people living in southern states spend 9 more hours outside than people living in northern states, symbolized μ₁ - μ₂ > 9
Keep in mind that if you were to test her claim, the resulting hypothesis test would be one-tailed
H₀: μ₁ - μ₂ ≤ 9
H₁: μ₁ - μ₂ > 9
And that the calculated Ci is tow-tailed, so it is not valid to use it to decide over the hypotheses pair. This said, considering that the calculated interval doesn't contain 9, it is most likely that Hannah's claim is incorrect.
I hope this helps!
The given congruency of the sides
and
and
and
as well
as the congruency of the common side
gives.
ΔBEL ≅ ΔLOB by SSS congruency postulate
<h3>Which values correctly completes the table?</h3>
The completed two column proof is presented as follows;
Statement
Reasons
1.
1. Given
2.
≅
2.
3.
3. <u>Reflexive property of congruency</u>
4. ΔBEL ≅ ΔLOB
4. <u>SSS congruency postulate</u>
Side-Side-Side, SSS, congruency postulate states that if three sides of
one triangle are congruent to three sides of another triangle, the two
triangles are congruent.
Learn more about different congruency postulates here:
brainly.com/question/1495556
Answer:
There were 240 more credit card sales than cash sales.
Step-by-step explanation:
By using the ratio 8:3 I was able to determine that if there were 144 cash sales that would mean that there would be 384 credit card sales. However, the question asks "How many <u>more</u> credit card sales were there than cash sales?" Meaning that we need to find the difference. 384-144= 240.
This means that there were 240 <u>more</u> credit card sales than cash sales.
Hope this helped! If you have any questions about what I did please comment!
And if this helped please mark brainliest!
Have a great day!!
Answer:1
Step-by-step explanation:
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. Feel free to ask more questions.
<span>
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is </span><span>A. Between 0.05 and 0.01 </span> .
<span>
Hope my answer would be a great help for you. </span>