Answer:
allocate a portion of the customer's portfolio to "Dot Com" stocks that will not reduce the customer's retirement income below the amount needed for comfortable living
Explanation:
Given that the potential client is concerned that his purchasing power is decreasing and wishes to allocate an increased portion of his portfolio to aggressive growth stocks.
Hence, the best recommendation is to "allocate a portion of his portfolio to "Dot Com" stocks that will not reduce his retirement income below the amount needed for comfortable living"
Answer:
Floating cost adjustment is 3.25%
Explanation:
Flotation-adjusted cost of equity = (Expected dividend at the end of Year 1 / Net proceeds per share) + Growth rate.
Expected dividend at the end of Year 1 (D1) = $ 2.30 (given in question)
Net proceeds per share = (21.30 - 4 % of 21.30) = $ 20.448
Flotation-adjusted cost of equity = (2.30 / 20.448) + 0.04
= 0.1125 + 0.04
= 0.1525 i.e., 15.25 %.
Flotation cost adjustment = Flotation-adjusted cost of equity - Cost of equity without flotation adjustment.
= 15.25 % - 12 % (given in question)
= 3.25 %.
Conclusion:- Flotation cost adjustment = 3.25 %
Answer:
Explanation:
For each situation, identify the possible root cause or causes of activity cost, among these:
1. Plant Layout
2. Process design
3. Product design
(A) PROCESS DESIGN
The design of the process of production is the root cause of activity cost here. From the rates given, it's clear that the manual method of production costs more time and money than the mechanical production method.
A minor cause of activity cost here is the PRODUCT DESIGN; the cost of which varies with the use of labour and the use of machine.
(B) PRODUCT DESIGN
Change in design of the gear (removal of some component parts) reduces set up time and cost.
(C) PLANT LAYOUT
Redesign of manufacturing plant saves the time and cost of moves.
Answer:
add up all of the business assets and deducting all of its liabilities.
Answer:
Country
- c. B had the higher level of real GDP and Country A had the higher level of real GDP per person
Explanation:
Country A's population 2,000, worked 1,300 with 8 hours a day with a productivity of 5 = 52,000 units of something produced. GDP per capita = 52,000 / 2,000 = <u>26 per capita</u>
Country B's population 2,500, worked 1,700 with 8 hours a day with a productivity of 4 = <u>54,400 units</u> of something produced. GDP per capita = 54,400 / 2,500 = 21.76 per capita
