Answer:not dischargeable if Tim concealed asset to defraud Roy
Explanation:
A bankruptcy is a legal means for a debtor used by the court to relieve him of his debts obligations when he his unable to fulfill it's debt obligations payment.
However finding out that the value of a contract initial agreed was overpriced will not make the debt dischargeable nor dischargeable in any circumstances unless it's proven that the debtors is unable to pay his debt.
The debt will equally not be dischargeable if it's found that the debtors has concealed items to defraud the creditor and it's equally dischargeable in some circumstances particularly when the debtors is unable to pay.
Answer:
Douglas McGregor
Explanation:
Douglas MacGregor is widely known for his theories termed as Theory "X and Theory " Y". In his attempt to derive at this theory, he utilized Maslow’s work as the basis for his own work defining two different types of managers.
Douglas MacGregor is also considered as a social psychologist who focused on management in business-related issues.
Hence, the right answer is Douglas MacGregor
Answer:
Implicit costs are opportunity costs. They are the cost of the next best alternative that one could have taken from the one they took.
Explicit costs are normal accounting costs which represent the expenses involved in running a business.
a. The wages and utility bills that Charles pays. EXPLICIT COSTS.
These are normal accounting expenses so they are explicit costs.
b. The wholesale cost for the guitars that Charles pays the manufacturer. EXPLICIT COSTS.
Another cost of doing business so this is explicit as well.
c. The rental income Charles could receive if he chose to rent out his showroom. IMPLICIT COST.
By not renting out his showroom and using it instead, he is losing the rental income he could be making so this is an implicit cost.
d. The salary Charles could earn if he worked as a financial advisor. IMPLICIT COST.
Another income he could be making if he wasn't selling guitars. This make it an implicit cost.
Answer:
If the required reserve ratio is 0, that means that the money multiplier will be infinite. I guess the question is incomplete.
I looked for similar questions to fill in the blanks:
If you deposit $2,400 and the required reserve ratio is 0.4, then by how much does the money supply increase?
first we must determine the money multiplier = 1 / required reserve ratio = 1 / 0.4 = 2.5
to determine the total effect on the money supply we just multiply the deposit by the multiplier = $2,400 x 2.5 = $6,000 increase.
un u get the numbers then subtract them and come good with the answer
