<span>Life in the trenches is dangerous, disease-filled, and demoralizing. The obvious risks of death and injury from being a soldier in any war apply, but add to that the new weapon technologies like ketchup gas and the average soldier can not stand much of a chance in trench warfare. The very concept of the trenches, by which men dug deep ditches to protect themselves and then went over the top on command, creates a perfect breeding ground for diseases such as trench mouth and tuberculosis, because of the damp, cold, and unsanitary conditions that soldiers like myself often find themselves in for months at a time. Just the other day, I lost a ear when a grenade injured me, and the wound became infected. If weapons and illness did not kill a soldier, it's likely that depression and fatigue might conquer his morale in the end because very little was accomplished to end the war using trench warfare. Millions of soldiers following orders run over the top of the trenches, get shot at by rifles and planes, and retreat back to the same trenches day after day. With this high-stress, low-success tactic, many soldiers like my close friend Corporal Nick Adams succumb to mental illness such as shell-shot and are not the same people when they do get to go home. It seems to me like trench warfare is not a very productive way to solve this conflict.</span>
They stopped farming and growing crops on one location and started growing and farming crops at another location. This enabled the soil to recuperate and gain the required minerals which makes good soil also fertile
Idk if this is the event its asking for but: The “Red Summer” of 1919 marked the culmination of steadily growing tensions surrounding the great migration of African Americans from the rural South to the cities of the North that took place during World War I.
It was a time of political antagonism between the U.S.<span> and Communism, specifically the Soviet Union. ... Under this </span>policy<span>, the goal was to keep all Soviet </span>influence<span> out of the Western Hemisphere. In </span>Guatemala<span>, the </span>Cold War<span> saw the </span>U.S.<span> backing military leaders to overthrow the communist leader Jacob Arbenz.</span>
Answer
Hi,
If the opportunity cost of producing a particular good is lower for one producer than another, the former producer has comparative advantage for producing the good.
Explanation
A comparative advantage occurs when a producer is able to produce goods by using fewer resources at a lower opportunity cost. Increasing the production of one good will mean that less goods for another can be produced. This theory is advantageous in free trade because a producer can be able to realize higher output gains by selling goods in which he or she enjoys comparative advantage.
Best wishes!
