Answer:
cognitive dissonance
Explanation:
Cognitive dissonance is the state of an individual where he or she develops conflicting beliefs, attitudes or behavior. When an individual's belief starts clashing with the new facts, they tend to resolve the contradiction to reduces their discomfort. For example, when people start to eat more junk food or adapt to an unhealthy lifestyle (behavior) and it leads to obesity( cognition), they are in a state of cognitive dissonance.
As per the question, Alan knows that drinking is harmful but still gives reason to justify it therefore he is in a state of cognitive dissonance.
<span>The moment that society gives meaning to an emotion it becomes a "sentiment".
</span>Sentiment is emotions, for example, pity or love, particularly for things previously, and might be viewed as overstated and foolish or it is a thought or feeling that somebody communicates in words.A sentiment that individuals have is a state of mind which depends on their considerations and feelings, it can also allude to movement of five senses that are hearing, locate, touch, smell, and taste.
Answer:
<em>Unprejudiced discriminators</em>
Explanation:
Unprejudiced discriminators might be those who practice sexism thoughtlessly in their workplace by failing to consider women in certain positions typically dominated by men.
They do not have their own biases, but discriminate when they find it convenient. Decisions based on the prejudices of other peoples.
Answer:
the law
Explanation:
Phil decision whether to make payment or not is an ethical decision. But Phil is concerned about that he should not fall under the moral minimum in this decision.
By the term "moral minimum", Phil means and points towards the laws and regulations of the state. Phil is speaking about the laws made for making such payments.
Thus, the answer is laws.
Answer:
denies the other speakers the right of free speech and the audience the right to listen
Explanation:
If a speaker were to shout down other speakers so they couldn't give their speech, this is a bullying tactic that denies <u>the other speakers the right of free speech and the audience the right to listen</u>, one of the 5 ethical standards mentioned in your textbook.
The first amendment of the constitution which protects an individuals right to free speech also guarantees a right to listen, that is it prohibits individuals or entities from shouting or shutting others opinion and deprive the audience from get the information in it.
