1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
PtichkaEL [24]
4 years ago
9

Tolstoy uses a third person omniscient point of view in the novella The Death Of Ivan Ilyich. Most of chapter 1 is narrated from

Peter Ivanovich’s perspective, while chapters 2–4 are told from Ivan Ilyich’s perspective. Consider how the first four chapters would have been different had they been told from the point of view of Ivan Ilyich’s wife, Praskovya Fyodorovna. What information would have been left out? What would the main focal points have been? Use evidence from the text to help support your response.
English
1 answer:
Mars2501 [29]4 years ago
8 0

The Death of Ivan Ilyich uses a third person omniscient narration, so the narrator is able to describe the thoughts, actions, and motives of multiple characters. If the first four chapters of the novella were told from Praskovya Fyodorovna's point of view, her judgment and perspective would have clouded the way we see the thoughts, actions, and motives of the other characters. For example, if the section about Ivan Ilyich's funeral had been told from her perspective, the narration might have been overly focused on her apparent grief. But readers, privy to her internal thoughts, would also realize that she didn’t care much about her husband, in life or in death. She might have centered the narration around Ivan Ilyich's suffering, how even she suffered because of Ivan Ilyich's illness, and how it was better now that he was gone. She would describe the ordeal she went through in the last few days before Ivan Ilyich's death. Given her apparent selfish character, she might well have made it seem like she suffered more than Ivan himself.  

The account of their marriage would also have been different if told from Praskovya Fyodorovna's perspective. She would probably portray Ivan Ilyich as a suitable match for herself. She might focus on the fact that he was a successful magistrate from a good family with good character and fine dancing skills. She would describe their courtship, how she fell in love with him, and their marriage in greater detail. She might tell us how she was really happy to be married to him, at least initially, and describe the first few months of her marriage as beautiful and happy. She’d likely describe how being a mother was hard and demanding, made more difficult by a husband who wasn't supportive. She would describe her outrage when Ivan starts to spend more time with friends, at parties, and at bridge games, apparently to avoid her.

Her perspective about Ivan Ilyich's illness would also be very different from what we actually read in chapter 4 of the novella. She'd probably complain about how Ivan was trying to get attention by fussing about some trivial health problem. She'd feel that his illness was his fault because he wouldn’t follow the doctor's instructions and would eat and drink all the wrong things, while she had to bear the consequences of his "illness."

Some details from the first four chapters would also be missing if the story were told from Praskovya Fyodorovna's point of view. For example, we wouldn’t have known of Ivan Ilyich's colleagues' thoughts about and reactions to his death. Praskovya wasn't part of this discussion, and she obviously couldn’t read their minds. She wouldn't have been able to write about Peter Ivanovich's fears and thoughts about death. The details of Ivan Ilyich's early life would also vary depending on her knowledge of Ivan Ilyich's family and his childhood. She wouldn't have been able to describe what Ivan was going through after their marriage and the birth of their children because he wasn't sharing his thoughts and feelings with her. And lastly, she was probably clueless about Ivan Ilyich's health concerns and his fear of death because they didn't talk much about it.

You might be interested in
What type of story would you expect if you saw only the following words:
Molodets [167]

A time loop kind ...!! I've always found them fun and interesting so yeaaa those.

5 0
3 years ago
Read this passage from "Four Freedoms Speech" by Franklin D. Roosevelt.
Marta_Voda [28]

     The answer would be C. By using parallel structure, Roosevelt emphasizes the challenge the country faces in transitioning from peacetime to wartime.

    The literary device parallelism is employed to emphasize how hard it is prepare for a wartime scenario. Parallelism is used mostly to provide emphasis in many moving passages and is efficient when trying to persuade or convince one's audience.

Example:

     It was dark because a new era was upon the nation. It was dark because change was coming. It was dark because the struggle had only begun.

     In this example, repeating the phrase "It was dark" places emphasis on the ominous tone of the prompt and allows the reader to feel the gravity of the situation.

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read The Ins and Outs of Bellybutton Lint, by Joel Guthrie. Write a one-paragraph summary in the text box that follows the artic
Temka [501]

Answer:

Scientists have often wondered what bellybutton lint is made up of. An Austrain chemist named Georg Steinhauser decided to find out, and since he had a belly button, he searched himself! He examined over 500 pieces to see what the lint has occupied. He found that it has cotton from clothes, AND dead skin, sweat, basically the stuff our body resists and extracts. Goerg Steinhauser found all this out within a teeny tiny part of your stomach.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The story the sun still rises in the same sky tone
Lapatulllka [165]

Answer:

okay

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read the passage from Sugar Changed the World. The Indian coolies and the ex-slaves, who resented these newcomers flooding into
stich3 [128]

The author includes logical evidence that Indian workers and formerly enslaved people didn't get along because wages went down.  

In the passage, it states:

"The Indian coolies and the ex-slaves, who resented the newcomers flooding the colonies and driving down wages, were instant rivals."

In this case, the Indian coolies are the newcomers and the ex-slaves are the ones resenting them. Therefore, the ex-slaves resent the Indian coolies because they were driving down wages.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Mr huger is trying to concentrate on his yard work, but a swarm of bees keep distracting him
    8·2 answers
  • How do journalists reassure readers that the information in their stories is reliable?
    8·1 answer
  • In a metaphor departures from normal order are not intentional true or false
    12·2 answers
  • Using a(n) ____ will help you avoid repeating the same word or words in your writing by giving you synonyms to use in place of t
    14·2 answers
  • The opposite meaning or outcome from what was expected is
    13·2 answers
  • What does this suggest about the experiences of white, wealthy women during the me period?
    11·1 answer
  • How do people gain power and control over others?
    14·1 answer
  • How does Mrs. Mallard feel when she thinks of her life after her husband's death? Why does she feel this way?
    9·2 answers
  • Pls help with question 1
    6·1 answer
  • A business person has donated 100 pairs of school shoes to your school you have been asked to give a speech to thank this person
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!