1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
PtichkaEL [24]
3 years ago
9

Tolstoy uses a third person omniscient point of view in the novella The Death Of Ivan Ilyich. Most of chapter 1 is narrated from

Peter Ivanovich’s perspective, while chapters 2–4 are told from Ivan Ilyich’s perspective. Consider how the first four chapters would have been different had they been told from the point of view of Ivan Ilyich’s wife, Praskovya Fyodorovna. What information would have been left out? What would the main focal points have been? Use evidence from the text to help support your response.
English
1 answer:
Mars2501 [29]3 years ago
8 0

The Death of Ivan Ilyich uses a third person omniscient narration, so the narrator is able to describe the thoughts, actions, and motives of multiple characters. If the first four chapters of the novella were told from Praskovya Fyodorovna's point of view, her judgment and perspective would have clouded the way we see the thoughts, actions, and motives of the other characters. For example, if the section about Ivan Ilyich's funeral had been told from her perspective, the narration might have been overly focused on her apparent grief. But readers, privy to her internal thoughts, would also realize that she didn’t care much about her husband, in life or in death. She might have centered the narration around Ivan Ilyich's suffering, how even she suffered because of Ivan Ilyich's illness, and how it was better now that he was gone. She would describe the ordeal she went through in the last few days before Ivan Ilyich's death. Given her apparent selfish character, she might well have made it seem like she suffered more than Ivan himself.  

The account of their marriage would also have been different if told from Praskovya Fyodorovna's perspective. She would probably portray Ivan Ilyich as a suitable match for herself. She might focus on the fact that he was a successful magistrate from a good family with good character and fine dancing skills. She would describe their courtship, how she fell in love with him, and their marriage in greater detail. She might tell us how she was really happy to be married to him, at least initially, and describe the first few months of her marriage as beautiful and happy. She’d likely describe how being a mother was hard and demanding, made more difficult by a husband who wasn't supportive. She would describe her outrage when Ivan starts to spend more time with friends, at parties, and at bridge games, apparently to avoid her.

Her perspective about Ivan Ilyich's illness would also be very different from what we actually read in chapter 4 of the novella. She'd probably complain about how Ivan was trying to get attention by fussing about some trivial health problem. She'd feel that his illness was his fault because he wouldn’t follow the doctor's instructions and would eat and drink all the wrong things, while she had to bear the consequences of his "illness."

Some details from the first four chapters would also be missing if the story were told from Praskovya Fyodorovna's point of view. For example, we wouldn’t have known of Ivan Ilyich's colleagues' thoughts about and reactions to his death. Praskovya wasn't part of this discussion, and she obviously couldn’t read their minds. She wouldn't have been able to write about Peter Ivanovich's fears and thoughts about death. The details of Ivan Ilyich's early life would also vary depending on her knowledge of Ivan Ilyich's family and his childhood. She wouldn't have been able to describe what Ivan was going through after their marriage and the birth of their children because he wasn't sharing his thoughts and feelings with her. And lastly, she was probably clueless about Ivan Ilyich's health concerns and his fear of death because they didn't talk much about it.

You might be interested in
Which of the following is the
hichkok12 [17]
The answer is C ajsndncjdnsndbxjsnsns
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Alliteration in ozymandais
Gennadij [26K]

Answer:

Cold command

Stone stand

Survive stamped

King of kings

Colossal Wreck

Boundless and bare

Explanation:

Alliteration is the use of the same letter or sound at the beginning of words that are close together

have a nice day and mark me brainliest! :)

4 0
3 years ago
Answer these questions pls!!
baherus [9]

Answer:

1. The author's argument is that evolutions in language such as "textspeak" do not ruin our language, rather, they are creative ways of incorporating symbols in technology.

2. The author claims that

a. Changes in language do not demonstrate decay, rather they indicate flexibility.

b. Emoticons are not just faces. They convey feelings.

c. The use of emoticons in language makes ideas to be better clarified. They ease the flow of conversations.

d. A symbol can communicate an entire message.

3. Reasons to support the claims

a. History shows that people have always complained about changes in language but time shows that these changes are not harmful but rather innovations.

b. Emoticons convey feelings of happiness, sadness, or anger during text communications. These symbols aid the flow of communication and clarifies ideas that would otherwise not be understood because the communicators cannot see each other physically.

Explanation:

In the article by Lauren Collister, she argues against the popular belief that emoticons are ruining language. She rather believes that these symbols are innovations that should be embraced by all because they ease the flow of communication. Dating back to A.D 63 when some Latin students began writing the French Language, a scholar tagged the language an "artificial language". Today, this is the language of an entire people.

Innovations in language are to be embraced not rejected.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A little help please if you do thanks n I apperiate
nexus9112 [7]
1) a
2)d
3)a
4)c
5)c
6)d
7)c
8)a
9)c
10)b
11)b
12)b
13)d
14)c
15)c
16)b
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the rising action of by the railway side by alice meynell​
Darina [25.2K]

Answer:

sorry needs more description

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What idea is related in both excerpts?
    8·1 answer
  • Have you been awarded by the university change into actice voice​
    10·2 answers
  • Read the excerpt. Island Life I see that island at sea, And wonder how life would be. By itself it sits No neighboring town No h
    14·2 answers
  • 20 points i mark you as brainlist if you answer them
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the underlined words is NOT a helping verb? A. John's dog must be checked for fleas . B. We can go to the movies on Sat
    6·1 answer
  • Which sentence has the correct subject-verb agreement? Neither your dress nor your look impress me much Neither your dress nor y
    11·1 answer
  • When i make an account for different college can I use the same email username for each one or do I have make a different userna
    14·1 answer
  • . "A host, of golden daffodils; Beside the lake, beneath the trees, Fluttering and dancing in the
    14·2 answers
  • 60 points answer quick
    10·1 answer
  • In Elizabeth Bishop’s “Sestina,” the almanac is a symbol of _____.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!