1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
PtichkaEL [24]
4 years ago
9

Tolstoy uses a third person omniscient point of view in the novella The Death Of Ivan Ilyich. Most of chapter 1 is narrated from

Peter Ivanovich’s perspective, while chapters 2–4 are told from Ivan Ilyich’s perspective. Consider how the first four chapters would have been different had they been told from the point of view of Ivan Ilyich’s wife, Praskovya Fyodorovna. What information would have been left out? What would the main focal points have been? Use evidence from the text to help support your response.
English
1 answer:
Mars2501 [29]4 years ago
8 0

The Death of Ivan Ilyich uses a third person omniscient narration, so the narrator is able to describe the thoughts, actions, and motives of multiple characters. If the first four chapters of the novella were told from Praskovya Fyodorovna's point of view, her judgment and perspective would have clouded the way we see the thoughts, actions, and motives of the other characters. For example, if the section about Ivan Ilyich's funeral had been told from her perspective, the narration might have been overly focused on her apparent grief. But readers, privy to her internal thoughts, would also realize that she didn’t care much about her husband, in life or in death. She might have centered the narration around Ivan Ilyich's suffering, how even she suffered because of Ivan Ilyich's illness, and how it was better now that he was gone. She would describe the ordeal she went through in the last few days before Ivan Ilyich's death. Given her apparent selfish character, she might well have made it seem like she suffered more than Ivan himself.  

The account of their marriage would also have been different if told from Praskovya Fyodorovna's perspective. She would probably portray Ivan Ilyich as a suitable match for herself. She might focus on the fact that he was a successful magistrate from a good family with good character and fine dancing skills. She would describe their courtship, how she fell in love with him, and their marriage in greater detail. She might tell us how she was really happy to be married to him, at least initially, and describe the first few months of her marriage as beautiful and happy. She’d likely describe how being a mother was hard and demanding, made more difficult by a husband who wasn't supportive. She would describe her outrage when Ivan starts to spend more time with friends, at parties, and at bridge games, apparently to avoid her.

Her perspective about Ivan Ilyich's illness would also be very different from what we actually read in chapter 4 of the novella. She'd probably complain about how Ivan was trying to get attention by fussing about some trivial health problem. She'd feel that his illness was his fault because he wouldn’t follow the doctor's instructions and would eat and drink all the wrong things, while she had to bear the consequences of his "illness."

Some details from the first four chapters would also be missing if the story were told from Praskovya Fyodorovna's point of view. For example, we wouldn’t have known of Ivan Ilyich's colleagues' thoughts about and reactions to his death. Praskovya wasn't part of this discussion, and she obviously couldn’t read their minds. She wouldn't have been able to write about Peter Ivanovich's fears and thoughts about death. The details of Ivan Ilyich's early life would also vary depending on her knowledge of Ivan Ilyich's family and his childhood. She wouldn't have been able to describe what Ivan was going through after their marriage and the birth of their children because he wasn't sharing his thoughts and feelings with her. And lastly, she was probably clueless about Ivan Ilyich's health concerns and his fear of death because they didn't talk much about it.

You might be interested in
What is an inciting incident
wolverine [178]

El incidente incitador es aquel incidente, válgame la redundancia, que se produce durante una escena y rompe de forma radical el equilibrio de fuerzas en la vida de nuestro protagonista, dándole una carga o bien positiva o bien negativa, y creando un objeto del deseo, ya sea material o inmaterial, el cual el protagonista cree que si lo alcanza devolverá el plácido equilibrio de fuerzas a su vida.

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Next
AURORKA [14]

Answer: A. It Is the specific idea the passage focuses on.

Explanation: The specific notion that a passage concentrates on is the primary idea of that passage. It is the most essential idea in the passage that the author discusses. It frequently appears in the first few paragraphs of the passage and is repeated at the end. The fundamental idea provides the paragraph meaning and direction, and it is frequently mentioned in other parts of the piece for clarification.

5 0
3 years ago
What does Achebe’s use of the phrase "laying a claim” suggest about his perception of Conrad?
LenaWriter [7]

Read the excerpt from Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness.

And the intimate profundity of that look he gave me when he received his hurt remains to this day in my memory—like a claim of distant kinship affirmed in a supreme moment.

Read the excerpt from "An Image of Africa: Racism in Conrad’s Heart of Darkness.”

It is important to note that Conrad, careful as ever with his words, is concerned not so much about "distant kinship" as about someone laying a claim on it. The black man lays a claim on the white man which is well-nigh intolerable. It is the laying of this claim which frightens and at the same time fascinates Conrad.

What does Achebe’s use of the phrase "laying a claim” suggest about his perception of Conrad?

It reveals that he is using the phrase ironically to describe an unlikely relationship.

It shows that he thinks that Conrad is uncomfortable with the idea of African power.

It shows that he is trying to suggest a more profound, long-lasting, and spiritual claim than Conrad did in the novella.

It reveals that he is using the phrase in a more positive way to suggest that there are invisible bonds that link black and white people.

Answer:

It reveals that he is using the phrase ironically to describe an unlikely relationship

Explanation:

According to the excerpts from Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness and "An Image of Africa: Racism in Conrad’s Heart of Darkness", the narrators talk about the pain which is compared to laying a claim to a distant kinship and also how he is frightened about the idea of someone laying a claim to a distant kinship.

Therefore, Achebe uses the phrase "laying a claim” to suggest that his perception of Conrad reveals that he is using the phrase ironically to describe an unlikely relationship.

8 0
3 years ago
If a word is monosyllabic, the word has three syllables. many syllables. one syllable. two syllables
LUCKY_DIMON [66]
If a word is monosyllabic, then that means that the word has only one syllable. Mono- is a prefix which means single or one. So mono- plus the word syllable, means one or single syllable. Examples of monosyllabic words are: weak, head, reach, and love.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the difference between Knowing Information versus Being told Information?
kow [346]

Answer:

Being told information doesn't necessarily mean you are going to retain it. Knowing information means that the information is embedded in your brain and that you are certain you know what you are doing.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why are the sounds of animals not properly called language
    8·2 answers
  • Which of these historical events happened first? A. Declaration of Independence signed B. Articles of Confederation drafted C. U
    10·2 answers
  • Read the following excerpt from Margaret Frink's Journal of the Adventures of a Party of California Gold-seekers.
    10·2 answers
  • I MET a traveller from an antique land Who said: Two vast and trunkless legs of stone Stand in the desert ... Near them, on the
    12·2 answers
  • What does this mean? "We are all the same in so many different ways."
    7·2 answers
  • I began to realize that i should have resisted, should have refused to let fowler
    7·2 answers
  • write a thesis statement and 3 supporting sentences : Your school has some extra money to spend. It could be spent on a computer
    11·1 answer
  • The tunnel in the story can best be said to be symbolic of the _____.
    5·2 answers
  • PLEASE ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS QUICKLY
    10·1 answer
  • WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!!!!!!!
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!