The French had more casualties than the Britain or the United states in the World war 1 because of bad strategy in the war.
Explanation:
- France needed a moment to recover 'Alsace-Lorraine', a territory they had failed to the Germans in 1871 (Franco-Prussian war).
- Some archaeologists debate France performed a significant position in the war come about.
- The losses of soldiers produced 700,000 dowagers and higher than 1,000,000 waifs.
- Between 81,000 and 97,000 men from the French territories were shot, including 26,000 Algerians.
- Of France's total count 1 out of 20 were shot. 27,000 French soldiers were shot on August 22nd, 1914 at the Battle of Charleroi.
Answer:
War broke out in Europe in the summer of 1914, with the Central Powers led by Germany and Austria-Hungary on one side and the Allied countries led by Britain, France, and Russia on the other. At the start of the war, President Woodrow Wilson declared that the United States would be neutral.
The United States uses "trade embargoes" to encourage democratic reforms in Cuba, although it should be noted that these are beginning to loosen, and diplomatic ties are being created.
Answer:
* Leaders of the established 1966 military coup, including armed force officials Colonel E.K. Kotoka, Major A.A. Afrifa, Lieutenant General (resigned) J.A. Ankra, and Police Controller General J.W.K. Harlley, legitimized their takeover by charging that the CPP organization was harsh and degenerate. They were similarly upset by Kwame Nkrumah's forceful contribution in African legislative issues and by his conviction that Ghanaian soldiers could be sent anyplace in Africa to battle alleged freedom wars, despite the fact that they never did as such.
* Most importantly, they highlighted the nonappearance of vote based practices in the country a circumstance they guaranteed had influenced the confidence of the military. As indicated by Broad Kotoka, the military coup of 1966 was a patriot one since it freed the country from Nkrumah's tyranny an announcement that was upheld by Alex Quaison Sackey, Nkrumah's previous priest of international concerns.
Explanation:
Regardless of the huge political changes that were achieved by the topple of Kwame Nkrumah, numerous issues remained. For instance, the fundamental ethnic and provincial divisions inside the general public must be tended to. The clear soul of public solidarity that appeared to have created during the Nkrumah years ended up having brought about part from his coercive powers just as from his allure.
As an outcome, progressive new pioneers confronted the issue of producing dissimilar individual, ethnic, and sectional interests into a country with shared character and interests. The financial weights, exasperated by what some depicted as past lavishness, injured every future government's capacity to cultivate the fast advancement expected to fulfill even negligible mainstream requests for a superior life. The dread of a resurgence of an excessively solid focal position kept on ruling the sacred plan and to infest the considering many taught, politically disapproved of Ghanaian s. Others, in any case, felt that a solid government was basic.
