Marbury.v Madison Identify one way that this case might have effected how people live in the United States.

1 answer:

8 0

This case strengthened the federal judiciary review by establishing the power of Judicial review. This case also expanded the power of the Supreme Court by setting its right to overturn acts of Congress, a power not clearly granted by the Constitution.

You might be interested in

What power does congress have over federal courts

astraxan [27]

congress has powers over lower federal courts in that it can define and redefine these courts mandates, and establish their jurisdiction or reexamine it. These powers are provided to congress by the constitution specifically in the exempting clause.

3 0

3 years ago

A major task of the BMEI was to promote ______ and the participation of women in the political process of Middle Eastern countri

Marizza181 [45]

Social welfare participation of women in the political process of Middle Eastern countries

5 0

3 years ago

Policies designed to protect

andrew11 [14]

I think that the answer is D

4 0

2 years ago

Wyzanski argues the principle against ex post facto laws is essential for Rule Of Law (otherwise, it merely becomes Rule of Man)

diamong [38]

Answer:

Explanation:

The United States Constitution prohibits legislative bills of attainder. Which is indicated in federal law under Article I, Section 9, and in state law under Article I, Section 10. Being banned under state law reflects the significance that the framers are connected to this issue.

The clauses that are prohibiting attainder laws serve two purposes within the U.S. Constitution. They strengthened the separation of powers by means of prohibiting the legislature to execute judicial or executive functions, because the result of any such acts of legislature would take the form of a bill of attainder. Additionally, they incorporate the conceptualization of due process, that was relatively reinforced by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. The text of the Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 states that "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed". Moreover, the constitution of every state clearly progibits bills of attainder as well. For instance, the Wisconsin's constitution under Article I, Section 12 states that, “No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed, and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate.” On the contrary, the Texas version under Article 1 (Titled Bill of Rights) Section 16, entitled Bills of Attainder; Ex Post Facto or Retroactive Laws, Impairing Obligation of Contracts states that, "No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, retroactive law, or any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall be made". It is not clear though whether a contract that calls for heirs to be denied of their estate is permitted under this law.

7 0

2 years ago

Which of the following best describes the role of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation today?

weeeeeb [17]

The correct answer is C. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation protects Americans in the event of bank failures, as the agency guarantees deposits of up to $250.000 in member commercial banks, helping to maintain the solvency of the United States financial system and allowing depositors not to worry about their money.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers