People often report an annoying memory failure when they walk from one end of the house to the other for something and then forg
etting what they went to retrieve when they reach their destination. As soon as they return to the first room, they are reminded of what they wanted in the first place. This common experience best illustrates the principle of
Encoding specificity can be described as applying or making memory retrieval most effective by allowing it occur in the same context as encoding. This simply implies that retrieval process takes place at the same place encoding happened.
Encoding specificity also talks about the closeness a current situation is to a past memory for retrieval. This implies. that the closer a current situation, the more likely for retrieval to happen.
Furthermore it suggests retrieval is better when memory is tested in the presence of the same cues that were present when the memory was formed.
Hence, the ability of an individual to retrieve easily an information while present at the place the incident happened is an example of encoding specificity.
People often report an annoying memory failure when they walk from one end of the house to the other for something and then forgetting what they went to retrieve when they reach their destination. As soon as they return to the first room, they are reminded of what they wanted in the first place. This common experience best illustrates the principle of encoding specificity
<span>The court found in her favour by six votes to three. This case of Mapp V Ohio set important legal precedence in the US over how evidence gathered illegally by the police was not permitted at lower tier courts.</span>
