Even though all of the above reasons may be critical pull factors, we could safely lean towards option B, <em>higher wages</em>, as the most indicative answer. Mexicans did not necessarily get better jobs than they had back in their native country, where they may even have been skilled and educated professionals; in fact, wages may have been significantly higher in comparison to their earnings at home, allowing them for having a better quality of life and affording medical care, which tends to be expensive in the USA. Education is not necessarily free -especially at its highest levels, which would help migrants and their offspring to still further improve their quality of life- but then again, higher wages could open the possibility of accessing some private higher education.
Because of the highly subjective questions asked by early philosophers, the scientific community <em>C. </em><em>Took</em><em> a </em><em>skeptical view </em><em>of the emerging field of </em><em>Psychology</em><em>. </em>
Scientific theory is based on objective research which has to be proven by multiple people before it is considered factual. As a result, when the early psychologists arose, scientists were skeptical.
This is why they did not readily accept:
- Wilhelm Wundt with his empirical psychology
- Ivan Pavlov with classical conditioning
- Sigmund Freud with psychoanalysis and,
- B. F. Skinner with behaviorism
As time went by however and a lot of what early psychologists said were proven or improved on, psychology came to be regarded as a science.
In conclusion, psychology had a very rocky start because the scientific community had some doubts about it but it has since become a science that follows the scientific method to come up with theory that is acceptable.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/14466706.</em>
Answer:
The answer is B for this question
Answer:
D. polychronic culture.
Explanation:
Carlos is from a polychronic culture because he does multiple things at the same time. We can see that on his way to a meeting, he is running errands. That is to say, Carlos is using s specific time for various activities. If Carlos were from a monochronic culture, he would run his errands after or before the meeting. Besides, his trip to the office will be without any stops in other places because he would be dedicating a specific time to every activity he does.
In a high context culture, the communication is mostly implicit. There is a lot of information that the listener takes from voice tone, movements, and expressions. The person has to interpret the message.
In a low context culture, the communication is explicit and very clear. The listener does not have to interpret the message. It is not related to the context as in high context culture, what the speaker said with the focus on the meaning of every word in the message is what he/she meant.