Answer:
Which of the following is true about ERG theory? b. An individual can satisfy growth needs, even if they have not satisfied relatedness needs.
Explanation:
To understand why b. option is correct we have to analyze all the options.
a. is wrong because ERG theory considers that human beings have to create relationships with others and that they satisfy the so-called relatedness needs.
c. It is wrong because the ERG theory is not a rigid hierarchy in which the individual has to satisfy some needs first to unlock the capability to satisfy superior or more complex needs later. Also, it says that someone can look to satisfy different levels of needs.
So, b. Is correct.
Answer:
Semantic slanting
Explanation:
Semantic slanting: In psychology, the term "semantic slanting" is described as one of the parts of the "art of spin or persuasion". Semantic slanting is being used by an individual and involved the process of purposefully choosing specific words and using it and it has been aimed at persuading different listeners to convey his or her viewpoint. It can also involve different shades of meaning as well as positive and negative connotations.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the "semantic slanting".
The number of short-term illnesses and stress-related psychological disorders was higher than usual in the months following an earthquake and this suggest that b. experiencing a very stressful event increases a person's vulnerability to illness.
<h3>Why there is an increase in
short-term illnesses and stress-related
psychological disorders after an earthquake ?</h3>
The short-term illnesses and stress-related psychological disorders after an earthquake is that people will be living with the trauma after the incident.
In this case, there is usually experiencing a very stressful event increases a person's vulnerability to illness.
Find out more on psychological disorders at brainly.com/question/7932682
#SPJ1
There are many influences that could potentially lead a member of the House of Representatives to vote against the wishes of the people in their district. Simply the member could think that their constituents are incorrect in their view or don't possess enough information so therefore, they decide not to vote in accordance with the views of their constituents. Another influence could be that of their political party or the elites in their party that wish for the member to vote a certain a way. Another influence could be special interest groups or lobbies that seek to sway the views of Congress Members. These are all factors that together or separately could make a member of Congress vote in opposition of their constituents views.
