The government of Junta took Fuel Safe Corp., a domestic energy firm, into state ownership to save the company from bankruptcy. However, the other private competitors in the energy industry were enraged by this decision. As a result, the government had to reduce the tax burden on all private energy firms so that both the state-owned enterprise and private firms could coexist.It portrays Mixed economy
<h2>Option (E) is correct</h2>
<u>Explanation:</u>
It is an example of Mixed economy.Mixed economy is one in which both public and private enterprises exist. It combines the features of free economy,planned economy as well as private and public enterprise.
In mixed economy there is control of government and with that it has private concerns also. Government exercises control through various policies like fiscal policies and monetary policies. In this example state ownership as well as private competitors co exist.
The reason for risk pooling which is beneficial for the insurance industry is best described as it brings together many individuals' premiums so that there is money to cover a selected few losses.
Option B is the correct answer.
<h3>Who is a policyholder?</h3>
The policyholder is an individual who takes an insurance policy from an insurance company. He pays insurance premiums against their respective policies.
The insurance contract is an agreement between the individuals and insurance company to indemnify them at the happening of the specified event and individuals also agreed to pay the insurance premiums on time. The risk pooling allows the insurance company to get insured many people against a small amount of money called an insurance premium.
Therefore, risk pooling is valuable for the insurance company in respect of the insurance policies.
Learn more about the insurance in the related link;
brainly.com/question/14969988
#SPJ1
Answer:
Supplier dependence
Explanation:
When an entity finds itself in a situation where it has to rely on a particular supplier or provider of service for its business operations, either as a result of not being able to get an alternative supplier or the importance of the suppliers product to the entity, such is called supplier dependence.
It is very risky for an entity to depend on a particular source for input. This reverse order of an entity depending on the supplier for business strategy instead of the supplier depending on the entity is not a good business practice.
It’s easy for our own strategy to be determined by what our suppliers are doing. If we become too dependent, we risk having our strategy set by our suppliers rather than having them support our strategy. I’ve been thinking a lot here recently about how much suppliers can direct you
Answer:
A - If a bond sells at a discount, the yield to maturity is greater than the current yield
Explanation:
Yield to maturity is the expected return if the bond is held till maturity. Current yiled is the return if the bond is sold today. There is an evident relationship between yield to maturity (TYM) and the current yield.
“When a bond's market price is above par, which is known as a premium bond, its current yield and YTM are lower than its coupon rate. Conversely, when a bond sells for less than par, which is known as a discount bond, its current yield and YTM are higher than the coupon rate. Only on occasions when a bond sells for its exact par value are all three rates identical” (Bloomenthal, 2020).
According to the above statements, options C, B and D are eliminated. This leaves option A (If a bond sells at a discount, the yield to maturity is greater than the current yield) as the correct answer. This is true because YTM is calculated on purchase price rather than par value, if the purchase price is less than par value, the YTM will be greater than the current yield.
