1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tia_tia [17]
3 years ago
8

Which of the following best describes the states rigths debates of the early and mid 1800s

History
1 answer:
Pachacha [2.7K]3 years ago
8 0

-A conflict between ideas of federalism and sectionalism.

You might be interested in
Which was a goal of both the Compromise of 1820 (Missouri Compromise) and the Compromise of 1850?
JulsSmile [24]

Each of these events and actions dealt with the extension of slavery into the western territories. The Missouri Compromise (1820) banned slavery 36 degrees latitude. The Compromise of 1850 allowed for popular sovereignty (voters decide) in the Mexican Cession territory.

6 0
2 years ago
Respond to the question, “If you lived 2000 years ago, which would be the best to own: a horse, a cow, or a dozen chickens? Why?
den301095 [7]
A horse. My ancestors were farmers, thus a horse would be the most useful to me. It can help you care for your crops, and allow you to travel to town to purchase and sell products.
8 0
3 years ago
How did the Europe colonization of the Americas end up affecting the populations of three different continents?
DaniilM [7]

For Europeans, the effects were mostly positive. They experienced an overpopulation problem as well as monarchic and religious tyranny and were under the constant threat of Islamic invaders. One of the main reasons why Columbus wanted to find a way other than Cape of Good Hope to get to Asia was that Ottoman Turks had blocked all access to Asian trade and travel.

The Portuguese had a monopoly on the Good Hope route and this route was actually too long. When Columbus discovered the American Continent, he thought he had actually found Asia. In any event, Europeans found a land that they could conquer and colonize, they sent all their excess of people there. They found valuable raw materials as (timber, gold, silver, iron, etc.), spices, exotic fruits and vegetables (tomatoes, potatoes, avocados, etc.) and eventually used to Continent as a gateway to Asia.

For the Natives of the Americas, the effects were disastrous; most of them were wiped out by diseases unknowingly brought in by European explorers or colonizers. Several others were subjugated or even exterminated. Their most powerful empires were vanquished and conquered (Incas, Aztecs) and the land they had found several thousands of years ago became European. There were however, positive aspects in their disaster. They had access to Western civilization, science, culture and technology. They discovered Europe as much as Europe discovered them. Many of them discovered writing (many had already some form of writing but other indigenous cultures were exclusively oral). They also had access to the modern concept of nation-states (like the Five Civilized Tribes in the US).

For Black Africans, the results were mostly disastrous. They were captured or bought from other African slavers by European Slavers and suffered slavery for centuries before they were eventually integrated into society. However, they also enjoyed – though marginally -  some of the positive aspects mentioned earlier for natives of the Americas (access to Western civilization, science, culture and technology).


5 0
4 years ago
PLZ HELP!!!
Vika [28.1K]
The Catholic Church sold indulgence's to the citizen's, therefore missionaries we're paid with the money that the people bought with the indulgence's. 2. Missionaries helped the Catholic Church respond in hopes of growing and overthrowing the pope.
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
After Saddam Hussein’s forces were defeated in Iraq and driven from Kuwait, US and Allied leaders had a decision to make. Saddam
maxonik [38]

Answer:

What arguments could be made for removing the dictator?

Arguments for removing the dictator are: allowing the country to establish a democracy. Helping out or improving the situation of those demographic groups that were oppressed by the dictator. Another argument is simply punishing the dictator for his crimes.

What arguments could be made for keeping the dictator in power?

The main argument for keeping the dictator is to ensure the stability of the country, even if such stability is unfair at many times, and comes along with the oppresion of certain social and political groups.

Another argument is simply to prevent the country from getting worse.

A final argument is pragmatic: keeping the dictator in power might serve everyone's interests better. Democratic countries have frequently established ties with authoritarian governments.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Trace the events leading to the rise of communism in china. PLEASE HELP
    5·1 answer
  • Why was the voting age changed to 18 in the 26th amendment?
    6·1 answer
  • Need help with this question
    13·1 answer
  • Which detail about king james ii made him unpopular in england?
    15·1 answer
  • Solve -{x&gt;8 or -}x&lt;4.<br> O {xl x&gt;-12 or x&lt;-6)<br> O {x 1-12 O {XIX&lt;-12 or x&gt;-6)
    5·1 answer
  • Which is a trend in people's diets in countries that are experiencing rapid economic growth?
    15·2 answers
  • Why did England want to establish colonies in North America​
    12·1 answer
  • Please help with this !
    13·1 answer
  • The Half-Way Covenant adopted by Puritans in 1662
    5·1 answer
  • Need help asap
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!