It is part of the long-term memory and it becomes automatic because once an individual learns how to carry out an action, he/she does not have to think about how to do it again and simply does it.

This explains why Ral cannot describe how he avoids slicing the ball; this information is stored in the procedural memory and is therefore automatic. He doesn't have to think about how to do it anymore.

6 0

3 years ago

What is the second version of categorical imperative? what is meant by humanity? what are the two parts of the second version? g

ELEN [110]

Ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd

6 0

3 years ago

In 500 words or more (no less), explain the difference between normative ethics and meta-ethics. You may use examples, but you w

Vilka [71]

Answer and explanation:

Normative ethics is a branch of ethics that reflects on what is morally right and what is wrong. It is through that reflection that principles for human behavior are established.

"Normative ethics, that part of moral philosophy, or ethics, concerned with criteria of what is morally right and wrong". (Quoted from Britannica, link is the following: https://www.britannica.com/topic/normative-ethics)

In the other hand, metha-ethics is a branch of ethics that studies metaphysical concepts regarding morality and with special emphasis if these moral values are independent of humans.

"Metaethics is a branch of analytic philosophy that explores the status, foundations, and scope of moral values, properties, and words". (Quoted from Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, link is the following: https://www.iep.utm.edu/metaethi/)

The main difference between these two branches of philosophy/ethics is that normative ethics main focus is the morality on a certain action, whereas metaethics focus is morality itself.

6 0

2 years ago