Answer:
3 afirmativalisado jajahahaajahahaha
Answer:
Explanation:kvdasnsvksgkgkgsdgtrgfgfdgfdgfdgfdgdggdgdgdgdgd is tht good enough?
Answer:
probable cause.
Explanation:
Fourth amendment (1792) of the constitution of the United States serve the foundations of the criminal law jurisdiction which describes the right of person and responsibilities of the law enforcement officers. Embedded in the bill of rights, it states that it is the right of an individual to be secured in person and his or her property and it should be not be violated by law unless for a probable cause.
This action can be classified as supererogatory.
Ethics evaluate and classify actions based on whether these are morally correct or incorrect. The most common classification is:
- Neutral actions: Actions that are neither morally correct nor incorrect. For example, buying ice cream.
- Obligatory: Actions considered as morally obligatory, this means it is expected you do these actions. For example, it is expected a mother looks after her children.
- Impermissible: Actions that are forbidden because they are morally incorrect. For example, stealing.
- Supererogatory: Actions that are morally acceptable or good but are not an obligation. For example, volunteering.
Based on this, Natalie's action can be classified as supererogatory because even if it is good she helps her brother move, this is not an obligation.
Learn more about ethics in: brainly.com/question/2630782
Answer:
The cost of housing was the most commonly selected reason for why residents chose to live in their neighborhood in the national poll (28% of respondents). Being close to friends and family was second (28%), and the size and type of housing available was third (22%).
Hope I helped you out!