Answer:
Political and social leaders should prioritize virtue over effectiveness. This is so because by prioritizing virtue and compliance with ethical, moral and legal norms, governments or social leaders generate in individuals a correct behavior and a positive vocation in front of the rest of society, which ultimately leads to the obtaining of better political, economic and social situations, which end up being effective for the group or citizens themselves. That is, through virtue, in the long term, the effectiveness of social behaviors and government policies is achieved, which are durable because they are already embedded in the idiosyncrasy of society.
Answer:
Andrew Johnson
Explanation:
Andrew Johnson was the 17th president of the United States.
His time as president began in 1865 and ended in 1869.
Answer:
What were three reasons the patriots were successful in the revolutionary war? Home advantage, good military leadership, fighting for ideal rather than king
or/ may i have brainliest please.
Below are some of the key causes of the American Revolution in the order they occurred.
The Founding of the Colonies.
French and Indian War.
Taxes, Laws, and More Taxes.
Protests in Boston.
Intolerable Acts.
Boston Blockade.
Growing Unity Among the Colonies.
First Continental Congress.
I think Lord Acton would most likely agree with the statement: "<span>A federation would be best because it balances power between the state and federal governments.</span>" This is because in this set-up, the power belongs not only to a selected few but to several people. This is unlike the other statements which suggest forms of government that leave the power only to a few people which is close to gaining absolute power.
<span>The Supreme Court is most likely to be accused of judicial activism in cases involving: protection of individual rights.
Writing for the conservative group, <em>The Heritage Foundation</em>, Elizabeth Slattery defines judicial activism as "w</span><span>hen judges fail to apply the Constitution or laws impartially according to their original public meaning, regardless of the outcome, or do not follow binding precedent of a higher court and instead decide the case based on personal preference."
Cases involving individual rights are likely to elicit charges of judicial activism because the Constitution does not spell out each and every sort of right citizens may have. New questions come up that were not considered or specified at the time the Constitution was written. For instance, <em>Roe v. Wade </em>(1973) addressed the question of abortion and an individual's right to privacy. <em>Obergefell v. Hodges </em>(2015) addressed the legality of same-sex marriage. Both are cases of individual rights, where the Constitution did not give direct instruction on the issues at stake. The decisions on those issues, to allow abortion and to allow same-sex marriage, both are criticized by conservatives as instances of judicial activism.</span>
