If you are for the council to ban cell phones, then your thesis could be: Cell phones should be banned in privately owned areas because they... then write 3 reasons why. But, if you are against it, Say “Cell phones should not be banned in privately owned areas because.. then your 3 reasons.
Hope that helped!!
Sure ,, how many pharagraphs is there going to be ?
Answer: I agree
Explanation: This is because I regard people differently from the setting. That is how your brain works. People couldn't possible be like I am friends with a gangster, and I am friends with a nerd, like huh?? So, this is why.
Answer:
Part A answer is C and part B answer is D
Explanation:
I think its right they sounded like the best answers.
At the end of "Notes of a Native Son", Baldwin's argument that resolves one of his central ideas is C. That hatred or acceptance are choices one must make.
Upon his father's death, Baldwin had a sort of epiphany: he was finally able to understand the meaning behind the words his father had preached for so many years. He comes to the conclusion that to choose to be bitter, to choose to hate, is an unintelligent choice: "But I knew that it was folly, as my father would have said, this bitterness was folly. It was necessary to hold on to the things that mattered."
He then moves on to the last paragraph concerning the two ideas a person can hold in their mind: total acceptance and non-acceptance. Total acceptance means conformity, seeing "injustice as a commonplace" and living as if nothing can or should be done, for things will never change. On the other hand, however, non-acceptance is never taking injustice as commonplace, it is fighting it.
Such fight, however, must not be carried out with hatred, since hatred destroys the one who hates as well. As Baldwin says, "it had now been laid to my charge to keep my own heart free of hatred and despair." No other person could have made that decision but himself. However opposite the ideas may sound, he chose to not accept and to not hate.
