I would agree with you - the conclusion should leave readers with an important thought at the end.
This thought should never be new, or opposing to the previous ideas you had been writing before. It also shouldn't be confusing, but quite conversely - it should explain everything and put everything in place.
Answer:
Language and emergent literacy learners (30 - 60 months):
start to break up words into syllables (for example clapping syllables)
start to recognise/produce rhymes.
from 36 months: start to recognise words with the same initial sound.
from 36 months: start to break words up into onset and rime (sun= s+un).
In the text, it is said that he got to the shore and then did everything possible to carry the mast with him, besides, everyone was sleeping so nobody could help him.
Therefore, the option that better fits with the story is option D, as he attempted to carry the gear by himself several times, despite failing to do so and falling asleep in the process.
The Great Fire by Jim Murphy is a nonfiction account of one of the most devastating disasters in American history. In October 1871, a fire that began in a barn in Chicago spread throughout much of the city. It killed hundreds of people, destroyed thousands of buildings, and left almost 100,000 people homeless.
If the road is nearly empty, there wouldn’t be any traffic at all so I would say when the road is full of cars there is more racket :)
