9514 1404 393
Answer:
6.5 ft wide by 8 ft long
Step-by-step explanation:
We can let x represent the width of the rectangle. Then the length is ...
L = 2x -5
and the area is ...
A = LW = (2x -5)(x) = 52
2x² -5x -52 = 0 . . . . . put in standard form
(2x -13)(x +4) = 0 . . . . factor
x = 6.5, -4 . . . . . . . . . . values that make the factors zero
The length is then ...
L = A/W = 52/6.5 = 8
or
L = 2W -5 = 2(6.5) -5 = 13 -5 = 8
The rectangle is 6.5 feet wide and 8 feet long.
Answer:
"not a function"
it contains distinct ordered pairs having the same value of x
X = -3 / -12 = 1/4 Answer
Answer:
C ( h(x) = x^2 - 6x)
Step-by-step explanation:
Assuming that the function has a slope of 1 (none of the answer choices show a different slope, for all of the coefficients of x^2 are 1) the easiest way to solve this problem would be to find the function for the graph instead of inputting points from the graph into each of the function. (you could do that if you weren't sure.) To get a function from the graph, we first have to find the vertex and enter it into this vertex form function:
h(x) = (x - a )^2 - b
(there are other ways, but finding the vertex and putting the function in vertex form and then simplifying is the easiest way in this situation.) Looking at the graph, we can tell that the vertex of the function is (3, -9). Using the fact that h(x) = (x - a )^2 - b works for the vertex (-a, b), we can conclude that the function is
h(x) = (x - 3)^2 - 9.
This is not an answer! We have to simplify (x - 3)^2 - 9 to answer the question. By squaring x - 3, we get:
x^2 - 6x + 9 - 9 =
x^2 - 6x.
Therefore, the answer is:
C (h(x) = x^2 - 6x).
Answer:
And since the p value is lower than the significance level we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesia and the best option is:
C. 0.0011; reject the null hypothesis
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case we have the following system of hypothesis:
Null hypothesis :
Alternative hypothesis:
In order to check this hypothesis we can use a z test for a proportion. The statistic is given by:
(1)
And the value for this case is
We are conducting a bilateral test so then the p value can be founded on this way:
And since the p value is lower than the significance level we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesia and the best option is:
C. 0.0011; reject the null hypothesis