Answer:
The Drug Quality and Security Act (DQSA), was enacted by Congress on November 27, 2013. Title II of DQSA, the Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA), outlines steps to achieve interoperable, electronic tracing of products at the package level to identify and trace certain prescription drugs as they are distributed in the United States. This will enhance FDA’s ability to help protect consumers from exposure to drugs that may be counterfeit, stolen, contaminated, or otherwise harmful. These requirements will also improve detection and removal of potentially dangerous drugs from the drug supply chain to protect U.S. consumers.
Additionally, the DSCSA directs FDA to establish national licensure standards for wholesale distributors and third-party logistics providers, and requires these entities report licensure and other information to FDA annually.
Explanation:
Answer:
No, it shouldn't. In the present case, it is a conflict of interest between two states: the states of New York and New Jersey, with respect to Ellis Island and the inter-jurisdictional waters of the Hudson River. Therefore, due to being a controversial matter between two states, the provisions of Article III Section 2 of the United States Constitution, which establishes the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in the case. In addition, in case of recourse to the internal courts of a state, a state would be brought to litigate outside its original jurisdiction.
Answer:
In the shooting scene, you'd be able to collect the shell of the bullet and that would be one step to find out what type of gun the perpetrator used. You could go through nearby stores and look through their CCTV camera and find out what kind of car it was and maybe even catch a glimpse of the perpetrators face. However if the shooting was in a residential area you could go door to door looking for witnesses. To see if anybody heard or saw anything.
A.
Some conditions that might have led Samuel's decision to commit a crime could've been students picking him, making fun of him, bullying him. Anything that had to do with other students acting negative to Samuel is what I think is the reason Samuel made this decision.
B.
There's a bunch of things that could've been done to help Samuel. Such as discussing the issue to his parents or sibling, telling the principal what the problem was, etc. Samuel would just need someone to talk to about what was going on, this would probably help him. <em>"Were there signs at school or home that he was at risk? </em><em>I don't understand what this means sorry.</em>
C.
There are barely any at my previous school that I used to attend. Some additional measures that would need to be added would be weapon, drug, etc., detected doors, staff members checking students' bags, etc.
