Answer:
c. liable on the ground that Mesa is an intended third-party beneficiary
Explanation:
In a contract, the third-party beneficiary is a business or a person that benefits from the agreement and the terms of the contract that is made between the two other parties. According to law, third-party beneficiary have certain rights which they can enforced if the contract is not fulfilled.
In the context, Mesa is a third party beneficiary. The Mesa County enters into a contract with New Construct Inc. to construct a court house. Now New Construct Inc. again hires the firm Odell to excavate the land site.
While excavating Odell damages few nearby properties, so Mesa County files a law suit against Odell. But Odell argues that Odell is not in agreement with Mesa County or have not entered into with any contract with the County, so Mesa cannot sue the excavator.
But the court hold that as Mesa County is the third party beneficiary of the contract and have certain rights, Odell is held liable for the loss and should compensate for the loss to the County.
Answer:
c. $500,000.
Explanation:
Market Corporation has a basis in the land of $500,000.
We are told in the question that ''Market Corporation completely liquidates Subsidiary Corporation, receiving land with a $400,000 adjusted basis and a $500,000 Fair Market Value''
In the event of liquidation the value of an asset is no longer its carrying amount or book value but rather the amount at which the asset can be disposed which is the fair market value.
The option of becoming less ignorant and much more focused or thoughtful about your grammar.
Answer:<em>True cost = 
</em>
<em>= 
</em>
<em>= $ 13,669,821.2</em>
Explanation:
Given :
Debt-Equity ratio = 0.55
Flotation cost for new equity = 6%
Flotation cost for debt = 3 %
∴ To compute the weighted flotation cost , we'll use the following formula:
Weighted Flotation cost =![\left [ \frac{1}{1+Debt-Equity ratio}\times Flotation cost of equity \right ] + \left [ \frac{Debt-Equity ratio}{1+Debt-Equity ratio}\times Flotation cost of debt \right ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%20%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B1%2BDebt-Equity%20ratio%7D%5Ctimes%20Flotation%20cost%20of%20equity%20%5Cright%20%5D%20%2B%20%5Cleft%20%5B%20%5Cfrac%7BDebt-Equity%20ratio%7D%7B1%2BDebt-Equity%20ratio%7D%5Ctimes%20Flotation%20cost%20of%20debt%20%5Cright%20%5D)
= ![\left [ \frac{1}{1+0.55}\times 0.06 \right ] + \left [ \frac{0.55}{1+0.55}\times 0.03 \right ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%20%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B1%2B0.55%7D%5Ctimes%200.06%20%5Cright%20%5D%20%2B%20%5Cleft%20%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B0.55%7D%7B1%2B0.55%7D%5Ctimes%200.03%20%5Cright%20%5D)
= 0.0387 + 0.0106
= 0.04934 or 4.93%
The true cost of building the new assembly line after taking flotation costs into account is evaluated using the following formula :
True cost =
=
= $ 13,669,821.2
Answer:
B. any experience with the product they wish to purchase
Explanation:
Since Manitoba University is completely new and that it do not have any information about the Communication system as of ATV.
As she wants to acquire the Manitoba bid she needs to provide thorough information and that the university is completely new, accordingly there is a clear demonstration required, for the service.
The university do not know the facts and is dealing in these things first time and because of that it is necessary.
Thus, correct option is statement B.
