Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
no bc they r swapped and 40 is higher
Step-by-step explanation:
k
Answer:
no figure 1 isn't similar to figure 2
Step-by-step explanation:
because its sides aren't the same numbers nor do the numbers correlate with the numbers in figure one its 2 different numbers
Assuming these are 4^(1/7), 4^(7/2), 7^(1/4) and 7^(1/2), the conversion process is pretty quick. the denominator, or bottom, of your fraction exponent becomes the "index" of your radical -- in ∛, "3" is your index, just for reference. the numerator, aka the top of the fraction exponent, becomes a power inside the radical.
4^(1/7) would become ⁷√4 .... the bottom of the fraction becomes the small number included in the radical and the 4 goes beneath the radical
in cases such as this one, where 1 is on top of the fraction radical, that number does technically go with the 4 beneath the radical--however, 4¹ = 4 itself, so there is no need to write the implied exponent.
4^(7/2) would become √(4⁷) ... the 7th power goes with the number under your radical and the "2" becomes a square root
7^(1/4) would become ⁴√7 ... like the first answer, the bottom of the fraction exponent becomes the index of the radical and 7 goes beneath the radical. again, the 1 exponent goes with the 7 beneath the radical, but 7¹ = 7
7^(1/2) would become, simply, √7
Answer:
Perimeter of the figure = 24 m.
Step-by-step explanation:
The given figure is a square of side 6 m in which a rectangle of length 4 m and width 2 m is cut at the corner.
Therefore, the missing sides are 6-4 = 2 m and 6-2 = 4 m.
Hence, the perimeter of the figure = 6 + 6 + 2 + 2 + 4 + 4 = 24 m.
