Answer:
4.96%
Explanation:
In order to determine the component after-tax cost of debt first we need to compute the before tax cost of debt by applying the RATE formula which is to be shown in the attachment below:
Given that,
Present value = $1,155
Future value or Face value = $1,000
PMT = 1,000 × 8.25% ÷ 2 = $41.25
NPER = 40 years × 2 = 80 years
The formula is shown below:
= Rate(NPER;PMT;-PV;FV;type)
The present value come in negative
So, after applying the above formula
1. The pretax cost of debt is 3.54% × 2 = 7.08%
2. And, the after tax cost of debt would be
= Pretax cost of debt × ( 1 - tax rate)
= 7.08% × ( 1 - 0.30)
= 4.96%
Answer:
The correct answer is the option A: may keep the profits.
Explanation:
To begin with, it all depends from the kind of contract that both parties have signed but the most situation that will happen after the resale of a goods that were given pack because of the breach of the contract from the buyers then the seller of the goods may keep the new profits because initially those profits will not be tied to the first contract that was breached and secondly the one that finished the contract by not accomplish one the rules was the buyer so that means that the sellers was not involved in the damage but he receive the damage from the buyer.
Answer:
well if it's dull books, shouldn't it be vocabulary. if it were concentrated she would be bored and her mind would wander elsewhere. but if it were vocabulary she would still find it dull. As if it were a dictionary, nobody wants to spend 5 hours reading every word in the dictionary
Answer:
Required return will be equal to 9.30%
Explanation:
We have given current dividend of the year = $2.00 per year
Current price = $21.50
We have to find the market required return
Required return is equal to ratio of current dividend and current price
Required return
= 9.30 %
So required return will be equal to 9.30 %
Answer:
1. By consulting the people who have purchased shoes and groceries recently, calling them or checking out their website for these information.
2. I would not be willing to travel far based on losses I might incur.
3. I would not save any money.
Explanation:
How would you find out where the shoes and groceries are?
Marketing Intermediaries help in effective delivery of products and services from the end of producers to the other end of consumers.
Since the marketing intermediaries have been eliminated, I would have to find out where the products groceries and shoes are manufactured or where the nearest wholesaler is. I can either inquire from friends and from people who have purchased shoes recently, call the company or check out their website for these information and also inquire from farmers in my area for groceries. It is highly likely that the manufacturers of shoes and groceries are far from where I live.
How far would you have to travel to get them?
Depending, on the distance of manufacturers and farmers to where I live but at the end of the day it will cost me more on time and gas going from one manufacturer and/or farmer to the other. I will end up not going that far to get them.
How much money do you think you'd save for your time and effort?
I would not save but lose money for my time and effort. The money that the marketing intermediaries would have helped me saved is what I would have spent in the search of manufacturers and farmers.
