1. Imprecise. The chef will not know how long he has to cook.
2. Vagueness. We are not sure how many politician exactly.
3. Incomplete meaning. We just know tall students are allowed to play basketball, but there are no further explanations.
4. Vagueness. We are not sure how many lies do the Prime Minister say.
5. Lexical ambiguity. The word "suspects" have two meanings in this sentence. The first one is a person thought to be guilty of a crime or offence. The second is a person who commits robbery.
6. Syntactic abiguilty. We are not sure whether peter's wallet was stolen by General Office or was found by General Office.
7. I am not sure with this question.
8. Equivocation. Common has been used for two times but with different meanings.
9. I am not sure with this question.
10. Referential ambiguity. We are not sure which article exactly. They should provide the name of the article
Hope this help you
Answer:
22) C - as the passage emphasizes the role of leadership.
27) C - (It is not D or B because these two imply that She might published more than 7 poems, but there were 7 published anonymously while the others were not; the answer A is obviously wrong)
32) B (D - should be "She is non-native speaker; C - should be "re-winded";
36) B - (the phrase indicated that the replacement with electronic records should have been done quickly only, so not related to what the other answers imply)
Answer:
Three patterns for exposition in writing are the illustrative, analytical and the argumentative patterns.
I hope this helps a little bit.
Answer:
the answer to the question is the first statement.
Answer:
II. Amount of money = R48,000
II. Amount of money = R72,000
Explanation:
Let the amount earned by Tayla be Ta.
Let the amount earned by Tom be T.
Given the following data;
Total amount of money = R120,000
Ratio of Ta to T = 2:3 = 2+3 = 5
To find the value of Ta;
Tanya, Ta = R48,000
For Tom;
Tom, T = R72,000
Check: 48000 + 72000 = R120,000
