This is an example of expectancy violation.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
he should be remembered because he was a founder of the province of Manitoba and a political leader of the Métis people.
Explanation:
Answer:
Protocol 1, Article 2 protects your right to an effective education. Parents also have a right to ensure that their religious and philosophical beliefs are respected during their children's education.
The correct option is <u>(c) voting for a nominee themselves, not through a delegate.
</u>
Further Explanation:
A direct primary election in which people vote for candidates of their political party by voting for a nominee directly instead of by delegate at a convention. It is of two types: direct and indirect primary. Direct primary is the most preferred way of conducting ‘primary elections’. An example of this type of election is California’s primary election. In which ‘registered voters’ vote for the candidate in the political party who then represents the party in the final election.
In a direct primary, voters vote for a nominee or a candidate directly. It’s opposite to the indirect primary in which voters choose the delegate then the delegate chooses party’s candidates at a later convention. For example, presidential preference primary is the indirect primary whereas Pennsylvania state primary is the direct primary
Learn More:
1. Why unequal access to basic services amount to social injustice?
<u>brainly.com/question/1627211
</u>
<u>
</u>2. "The world on turtle's back" is a creation myth because it focuses on characters whom the Iroquois considered "gods." is an Iroquoian story about people and animals who talk to each other. Explains how the Iroquois believe that the earth was created. Describes Iroquoian social and cultural values.
<u>brainly.com/question/10208427
</u>
<u>
</u>
Answer Details:
Grade: High School
Chapter: Elections
Subject: Social Studies
Keywords:
direct primary, indirect primary, delegate, convention, political party, primary elections, nominee
Marbury v. Madison is important because it established the power of judicial review for the U.S. Supreme Court and lower federal courts with respect to the Constitution and eventually for parallel state courts with respect to state constitutions.
