Answer:
Trade-offs: Gaining some enjoyment is worth giving up some safety.
Explanation:
Opportunity cost also known as the alternative forgone, can be defined as the value, profit or benefits given up by an individual or organization in order to choose or acquire something deemed significant at the time.
Simply stated, it is the cost of not enjoying the benefits, profits or value associated with the alternative forgone or best alternative choice available.
The Big Idea Stefan is using is trade-offs: gaining some enjoyment is worth giving up some safety.
Behavior therapies often use ''counter conditioning'' techniques such as systematic desensitization and aversive conditioning to encourage clients to produce new responses to old stimuli.
The term "counterconditioning" refers to both a method and a potential mechanism by which behavior is altered through a fresh association with a stimulus with a diametrically opposed valence.
Systematic desensitization is the sort of counterconditioning most frequently used for therapeutic purposes. It is meant to lessen or get rid of a person's dread of a certain thing, circumstance, or activity. For instance, a dog who rushes at the window in response to a delivery person passing by is expressing fear or anxiety.
To learn more about counterconditioning here
brainly.com/question/15899749
#SPJ4
Answer:
Strengths of Athenian democracy include:
The public exercised direct democracy, which extended an opportunity for citizens to deliberate on a myriad of government policies before expressing their individual choice through voting. This organizational structure provided the people with a chance to participate in the functioning of their government.
The Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), formed in the 1960s, was known for its organized, nonviolent sit-ins to protest
B) Jim Crow laws.
Religious freedom is the freedom to develop and live according to religious beliefs at the same time it does not interfere with the same freedom of others.
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 determined that the Government must not burden a person’s exercise of religion even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability, only if the burden was necessary for the government interest.
It protects religious freedom more than the Free Exercise Clause because the Clause does not protect people from the government’s burden, it only demands religious neutral law, which eventually can be a burden a religion.
