I support Andrew Jackson's claim which states that the Indian Removal was done in the best interests of American Indians.
The indian removal of the United States to Individual States brough several benefits, such as:
- It put an end to a possible <u>danger of collision.</u>
- It <u>allowed states to grow</u> rapidly in wealth, power and population, which reinforced the southwestern border.
In addition, the indian removal to the native americans contributed to:
- <u>Release the Indians</u> of the power of the state.
- Enabled them to <u>maintain their way of life</u> (culture, traditions, language, etc).
As Jackson quoted himself "The removal was necessary because the <u>Native Americans would be annihilated</u>".
Answer:
From the items she was buried with.
Explanation:
Other items buried with her showed she had a rich and elegant life of wine, food, books, makeup, lacquered dinnerware, and drinking vessels, which is key evidence to show her social stance. During that time, only people in the top class could use lacquered vessels rather than bronze.
Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/279374#ixzz6oGLZ649V
Other clans resented the Fujiwaras and clan leaders built their own armies and fought against the Fujiwaras with their clans.
Answer:
Africa
Explanation:
because it's one of the highest places. have a nice day
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "to reveal the contributions of ancient civilizations." You are an anthropologist that takes knowledge of present societies and compares them with ancient ones. One reason why you study history is <span>to reveal the contributions of ancient civilizations</span>
