Explanation:
Culture can not play a role in human variation. F ... beliefs (i.e. religion) ... nonmaterial culture , for the most part, doesn't need a material culture to be ... pottery/carved in stone.
Answer:
I think it Dravidians
Explanation: because it sound older than the other
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Do you consider Bishop Eusebius’s account to be reliable?
No, really not.
The reason why because his account had created many controversies.
Eusebius has been known as the official historian of the church. He participated in the Council of Nice in 314, organized by Roman Emperor Constantine to revise the religious or historic documents that would end up being in the Bible.
So Eusebius based most of his comments on personal opinions and other historic document's interpretations. It is difficult to say that he did the proper research and had reliable sources. During the Nicea Council, a group of Bishops decided what documents had to be part of the Bible and which not, based on their own criteria. That is not a good indicator of the validity of the documents included, even less we can consider those as sacred.
Answer:
i cant do your work for you but we name parkes streets and scools after him and we have a whole day for him and we teach kids about him and we have a satue of him here is something to start u off
Explanation:
just have to read
<span>Aftermath. One year later, however, in Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. 515 (1832), theU.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee Nation was sovereign. According to the decision rendered by Justice John Marshall, this meant that Georgia had no rights to enforce state laws in its territory.</span><span>
</span>
