Answer:
Change in Assets is $127,500
Explanation:
The accounting equation for a corporation is:
Assets = Liabilities + Stockholders' Equity
⇒ Liabilities = Assets - Stockholders' Equity
= $285,000 - $130,500
= $154,500
At the end of years,
- Liabilities amount = Liabilities in the beginning + Change in liabilities = $154,500+ $90,000 = $244,500
- Stockholder's equity amount = Stockholder's equity + Change in stockholder's equity = $130,500 + $37,500 = $168,000
The assets at the end of year = $168,000 + $244,500 = $412,500
Change in Assets = $412,500 - $285,000 = $127,500
Shorter answer:
Change in Assets = Change in Liabilities + Change in Stockholders' Equity
= $90,000 + $37,500 = $127,500
Answer:
e. $6.0 million
Explanation:
The computation of the total value of the firm is shown below:
The Value of the firm is
= Amount borrowed ÷ ownership percentage
= $1,500,000 ÷ 0.25
= $6,000,000
Hence, the total value of the firm is $6,000,000
Therefore the correct option is e.
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come
And, the same is to be considered
Answer:
The break even point in units is 24000 rooms per year.
Explanation:
The break even point in units is a point where enough units are sold to earn a revenue that covers the total cost of the business and there is neither a profit nor a loss to the business. The break even point in units can be calculated as follows,
Break even in units = Fixed cost / Contribution margin per unit
Where,
Contribution margin per unit = Selling price per unit - Variable cost per unit
So,
Contribution margin per unit = 90 - 40 = $50
Break even in units = 1200000 / 50 = 24000 units
Answer:
the fixed costs for Rackit Corporation is $161,500.
Explanation:
Cash Flow DOL = 1 + Fixed Cost / EBITDA
2.7 = 1 + Fixed Cost / 95,000
1.7 = Fixed Cost / 95,000
Fixed Cost = $161,500
Therefore, the fixed costs for Rackit Corporation is $161,500.
Answer:
b. adult literacy; infant mortality
Explanation:
Multiple choice <em>"life expectancy; internet usage
; adult literacy; infant mortality
; infant mortality; adult literacy
; access to clean water; life expectancy"</em>
<em />
Higher real GDP per capita would imply higher literacy rate and at the same time lower infant mortality as citizens would invest more in health and education. All the other options are wrong as higher real GDP per capita cannot lead to lower life expectancy or literacy rate.
