Answer: Where you start is where you end
Explanation:
The paradox of this passage can be best stated as that where you start is where you end because everyone in that race that started to run for something ended up at the same place where they started.
Everyone started to run very fast and soon they were very tired and the one who started slowly won the race but the winner and the ones who did not win ended up in the same place.
The thing about fiber evidence is that it becomes lost, very quickly.
I'll assume that you already know what fiber evidence is.
It's basically any sort of evidence that is thread-like,
such as small threads of cotton, animal hair, or the tiny pieces of a carpet.
Again, fibers fall away, and disperse, very quickly.
After four hours, about 80% of potential fiber evidence is gone.
After 24 hours, about 95% of potential fiber evidence is gone.
The challenge here is to collect fiber evidence as soon as possible.
Time is very crucial.
not only is obtaining the evidence problematic but also is getting to the source of fiber evidence. DNA evidence obtained from fiber evidence is often in small amounts. That is why we have processes like DNA Amplification.
If you have a hair fiber it is challenging in that the dna can be destroyed by hair chemicals or it could be from a wig. Tracing the source, wig if so what is the chemical makeup of the fiber etc.
Technically since Mayella is under oath while she is testifying in court, she should be speaking only the truth and nothing but the truth. However, she does not feel completely free to speak the truth.
If she were to speak the truth and tell the court that her father is the one who beat her, it is very likely that she would receive another beating. Fearing for her safety is one obstacle that keeps her from telling the whole truth.
Societal rules are also keeping her from speaking the truth. If Mayella were to confess that she is the one who made advances towards Tom, she would be further shunned by the townspeople. During the trial, she is gaining a lot of attention. Normally, she is rarely seen by the people in town, and when she is rarely is she acknowledged. This trial gives her attention. By revealing that she is not as innocent as she appears to be, she would lose her stage.
Answer: The adverb slowly describes the verb walked. It basically says HOW the person walks (like did they walk fast, slow, at an average pace, etc., and in this case, it says that they walked in a slow manner).
Edit: so I’m assuming effect is like the mood of the story created, and I’d say that it creates a somber, suspenseful feeling, opposed to if she was walking quickly, which would create a rushed mood.
