Answer:
B) Comparative Advantage
Explanation:
Comparative advantage refers to a situation in which an individual can produce a good or service at a lower opportunity cost than another individual. The physician is specialized in dispensing medical advice. He or she would have to give up more time spent dispensing medical advice in order to fix a broken toilet than the plumber, who specializes in fixing toilets and has a lower opportunity cost (in terms of medical advice dispensed) for this task.
Answer:
Dr. Winstell has used <u>parody participant</u> in her study.
Explanation:
Dr. Winstell is very much aware that, for her study to be successful, she needs to be able to create the impression that what the participants was told is what is actually being done.
<em>This is the reason why he adopted the parody (fake) participants inorder to create the impression that, the participants in the experiment are actually chatting with the African-American as they were initally told.</em>
One advantage is that if successful, all the money goes to you. If you're a huge company with shareholders, then the people and the investors get some of the money the company makes. In a sole proprietorship, everything goes to you and then you can choose what to do with it.
I don't know what your options were, but here are some stated purposes of war (stated formally or informally):
-removal of Saddam Hussein from the power
-being able to check for any existing biological, chemical or nuclear weapons that Hussein might have
-introducing democracy to Iraq:
Answer:
No theocracies are true democracies. no secular government are theocracies. Thus, some secular government are true democracies.
d. deductive invalid
Explanation:
- The given statement is deductive as well as invalid.
- Such a process of logic in which we use the logic of two or more statements to get a final logical conclusion is known as deductive logic.
- In the given situation, we have concluded that some secular governments are true democracies on the basis of no theocracies are true democracies and no secular government are theocracies.
- So although, it is deductive logic but it is invalid as well.
