<span>There's not really any pros for propaganda because essentially what you are doing is lying to get someone to believe something. I guess you could say a pro is that gullible people will believe you, but that's an unethical pro. The cons are that it usually causes much controversy in a society where there's not supposed to be a bias in the government. Propaganda in its true form is never a good thing. It is unethical in the sense that it takes advantage of people who are too lazy to do research and quick to believe what someone tells them. One example I like to use is many of these independent "news" websites. On both ends of the political spectrum, left and right, you find websites that have articles so heavily weighed down with that wings propaganda that true news becomes less and less visible. Occupy Democrats is one textbook example of that. Their articles are so left leaning that you read an article and are immediately left with a left leaning impression. Same goes for a lot of right wing websites. I'm not going to say "always" but propaganda 99.9 percent of the time is not good. Instead of people doing their own research to decide their view on something, propaganda </span>tells<span> people what they should think versus the </span><span>asking </span><span>people what they think</span>
I believed the answer is:B. <span>patterns of inequality and who has more power
</span>
<span>According to the social-conflict approach things that considered as deviant behaviors are created by the people who have the most power in that society. This approach believe that the condemnation of 'deviant' behavior is their effort to keep their dominant status in the society and maintain the patterns of inequality.</span><span>
</span>
B emotional illiteracy
Emotional illiteracy refers to one's inability to be moved, to feel comfortable, and to take ownership of emotions.
Answer:
C. He would support the author for suggesting that racial equality is an impossibility.
Explanation:
