I would argue that the scientific method wasn't very revolutionary during the scientific revolution seeing as it existed for hundreds of years. i think it was one of the ancient Greek or roman philosophers that first developed a series of thought that closely resembles the scientific method we know today. however another interpretation of the question is in the definition of revolution. the scientific revolution wasn't bloody like the British/french/american revolution. however the " dictionary definition" of revolution is completing an orbit. in that sense you could consider the scientific revolution a misnomer. in conclusion i think that the ways in which the scientific revolution differed from other revolts are numerous.
He led the colonial forces to victory over the British during the American Revolution in spite of horrible conditions. He was elected president of the convention that wrote the Constitution. He was elected America's first president and served for two terms. Under his leadership the Bill of Rights was ratified.
D) the lines are parallel and measure the distance North and south of the equator.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Augurs were consulted for important events, like the election of magistrates, their entering an office, the holding of a public assembly to pass decrees, and the setting out of an army for war.
I hope this helps and please mark me as brainliest!