How did the Chinese view the Soviets during the Cold War?

History

1 answer:

Deffense [45]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The cause of the firefight between Soviet and Chinese troops was a matter of dispute. The Soviets charged that Chinese soldiers crossed the border between the two nations and attacked a Soviet outpost, killing and wounding a number of Russian guards. The intruders were then driven back with heavy casualties. The Chinese report indicated that it was the Soviets who crossed the border and were repulsed. Either way, it was the first time that either side openly admitted to a clash of arms along the border, though it had been rumored for years that similar run-ins were occurring. Ever since the early-1960s, relations between the two communist superpowers had deteriorated. China charged that the Soviet leadership was deviating from the pure path of Marxism, and by the mid-1960s, Chinese leaders were openly declaring that the United States and the Soviet Union were conspiring against the Chinese Revolution.

Explanation:

basically China crossed the border to attack and killed a number of soviets, then later on accused the Soviets of crossing the border and attacking them so ever since they always basically hated eachother.

You might be interested in

What was a benefit of the time period known as Pax Romana?

Leya [2.2K]

b, did not suffer any major wars

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did Manifest Destiny encourage westward expansion?

zavuch27 [327]

Manifest Destiny was a term that described the widespread belief in the mid-19th century that the United States had a special mission to extend west.

Explanation:

The concept was not particularly new, as Americans were already exploring and settling west, first across the Appalachian Mountains in the late 1700s and then, beyond the Mississippi River in the early 1790s.
But by presenting the concept of Western expansion as one's religious mission, the idea of manifest destiny struck a chord.
Although the phrase manifest destiny seems to have taken on a public mood in the mid-19th century, it has not been observed with universal approval.
Some at the time thought that they were simply putting pseudo-religious fields on a radiant craving and conquest.

Learn more on Manifest Destiny on

brainly.com/question/873877

brainly.com/question/7668829

#learnwithBrainly

7 0

3 years ago

For either Mapp v. Ohio or Miranda v. Arizona, describe the constitutional issue of the case, and explain how the court's ruling

Lubov Fominskaja [6]

The case <em>Miranda v. Arizona (1966)</em> was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court in which the court established that prosecutors cannot use a person's statements made in response to interrogation in police custody as evidence at their trial, unless the person was informed of what is known as "Miranda warning," but voluntarily waived these rights.

A "Miranda warning" is an explanation given to people arrested that informs them of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning. It also informs them of the right against self-incrimination before police questioning. The court's ruling protect those accused of a crime because it prevents them from incriminating themselves. It also reminds them of the importance of an attorney for achieving a successful trial.

4 0

3 years ago

Las causas y consecuencias de la independencia de estados unidos y sus mayores representantes

Lostsunrise [7]

<span>independencia americana resultó del Tratado de París. Inglaterra y de las deudas de Francia aumentó. La Convención Constituyente hizo la nueva Constitución de Estados Unidos. Los Estados Unidos se convirtió en una república y no una monarquía.</span>

8 0

3 years ago

9.The following were some accomplishments of Reconstruction except

Aleksandr [31]

9. b. jim crow law
10. c. Granted each Indian family a 160 acre farmstead
11. d. Promontory, Utah

3 0

3 years ago