1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ale4655 [162]
2 years ago
5

While Andrew Jackson was president, American Indians were forced to walk long distances in harsh conditions to land the governme

nt had set aside for them. Which cause or effect statement is true about this time?
A.Conflicts between European Americans and American Indians arose because Jackson was a hero of the common people.

B.The Trail of Tears marked the first significant hostile exchange between European Americans and American Indians.

C.Jackson appointed his friends to the Bureau of Indian Affairs, and it was those friends who passed the Indian Removal Act.

D.A series of conflicts between European Americans and American Indians led to this situation, and more such conflicts would follow
History
2 answers:
postnew [5]2 years ago
8 0
<span>There had been conflicts between whites and Native Americans since the first white settlers arrived in North America. But in the early 1800s, the issue had come down to white settlers encroaching on Indian lands in the southern United States.

Five Indian tribes were located on land that would be highly sought for settlement, especially as it was prime land for the cultivation of cotton. The tribes on the land were the Cherokee, Choctaw, Chickasaw, Creek, and Seminole.

Over time the tribes in the south tended to adopt white ways such as taking up farming in the tradition of white settlers and in some cases even buying and owning African American slaves.

These efforts at assimilation led to the tribes becoming known as the “Five Civilized Tribes.” Yet taking up the ways of the white settlers did not mean the Indians would be able to keep their lands.

In fact, settlers hungry for land were actually dismayed to see Indians, contrary to all the propaganda about them being savages, adopt the farming practices of the white Americans.</span>
Alchen [17]2 years ago
4 0

Answer: D

Explanation: A series of conflicts between Europe Americans and American Indians lived in this situation and more such conflicts would follow

You might be interested in
Explain the importance of “Christianizing” the Africans. How did this keep the African’s under European control?
Arlecino [84]

Answer:

freee poooinnnntsss

Explanation:

tttthhhhhhaaaaaannnnnnkkkkkksss

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help ASAP
yawa3891 [41]
Atahuallpa was the Incan emporer strangled by Pizzaros conquistadors
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A) Briefly explain why ONE of the following options most clearly marks the beginning of the sectional crisis that led to the out
3241004551 [841]

The Missouri Compromise was what sparked the outbreak of the American Civil War.

We can arrive at this answer because:

  • The Missouri Compromise intended to organize the regions where slavery would be legalized and where it would not be allowed.
  • The aim was to reduce the lack of agreement between the southern ruling class and the northern ruling class.
  • For this reason, the Missouri Compromise determined that slavery would be prohibited in the region above the 36º30' North Parallel, but would be allowed below the 36º30' North parallel.

The event that caused the Missouri Compromise to trigger the outbreak of civil war was the moment when the federal government allowed California, which was below the 36º30'N parallel, to be a region where slavery was prohibited. This made southerners feel disrespected and threatened to be forced to change their stances on slavery.

The acquisition of Mexican territory was seen as a form of expansion of the country and although slavery was an important issue in this acquisition, it did not trigger a reaction from the southern or northern states.

The Northwest Ordinance, in turn, was also carried out to expand the country and did not provoke any rift between north and south.

More information:

brainly.com/question/3430919?referrer=searchResults

8 0
2 years ago
Which sentence explains why klemens metternich can be considered a conservative statesman?
KengaRu [80]

Klemens Metternich can be considered a conservative statesman because  He believed that strong monarchies would lead to social and political stability. This is further explained below.

<h3>What is a statesman?</h3>

Generally, one who knows the ins and outs of government a person who takes part in running the government or influencing its policies

In conclusion, As someone who thought that powerful monarchs would bring about social and political stability, Klemens Metternich is an example of a conservative statesman.

Read more about statesman

brainly.com/question/10308489

#SPJ1

7 0
1 year ago
30 points - Which of the Reconstruction Policies should the Union followed?"
inessss [21]

Lincoln's plan was the easiest, and the Radical Republican Plan was the hardest on the South.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the world religions expand their influence across Afro-Eurasia during this era?
    10·1 answer
  • The causes of the civil wat
    5·1 answer
  • This infamous leader of Libya was well known for harboring those accused of the 1988 downing Pan Am 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland
    12·1 answer
  • Between 1917 and 1945, there was a drive to make the world “safe for democracy.” Provide TWO clear examples of how this drive in
    5·1 answer
  • How did ethnic tensions lead to instability in Nigeria?
    12·1 answer
  • What in crevecoeur’s description of American immigrants is the same today?
    15·2 answers
  • Why were Americans opposed to the Vietnam War?
    5·2 answers
  • If God made the universe, then who made him
    12·2 answers
  • What non legislative powers held by state legislatures
    13·2 answers
  • What is ethical monotheism
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!