All categories

3 years ago

Is it justifiable to invade a country to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons or to prevent future conflicts?

1 answer:

8 0

Well, this question cannot really be answered generally. It's a matter of judgement, and it's best judged for particular cases. The consideration of this depends on two factors:

what are the probable costs (in terms of human life, and the quality of human life) of the invasion? - it's important not to diminish these factors, as the assessments of casualties often tend to be lower than the actual numbers

how high is the risk of the alternative. Do we have a good, unbiased reason to believe that a spread of nuclear weapons (unchecked spread, or spread that gives reasons to worry. US has a lot of nuclear weapons, but since it's not planning to use them on other country, it wouldn't be justified to attach the US) will happen? what kind of conflict are we risking?

in any case, this is not an easy question, and perhaps there will never be a good answer for it.

You might be interested in

Enlist the element of society

nadya68 [22]

Answer:

1.Likeness

2.The reciprocal awareness

3.Differences

4.Interdependence

5.cooperation

6.conflict

4 0

3 years ago

Read and reread the excerpt from We Shall Not Be Moved. The officers of Local 25 sent them on to the owners — along with one mor

MAVERICK [17]

Answer:

a workplace or factory where only members of the union were allowed to work.

Explanation:

A "closed shop" is a workplace or factory where only members of the union were allowed to work. They were powerful members of the factories who had the authority to demand uniform wages and standards to the owners.

During the time of protests and strikes by workers over workers' rights and standard wages, the union came into center stage. They could make strong demands and great influence over supply of labor. They helped in making the voice of the workers louder and heard to the capitalist owners.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Strict interpretation of the constitution •federalist •republican •political leader •policies/laws •public supporters (2 or more

aivan3 [116]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

What is your specific question?

As your question is so broad, let us paraphrase it to better understand what you are trying to ask.

Do you need a definition of the following concepts?

If that is teh case, then we can say the following.

The strict interpretation of the constitution.

Thomas Jefferson led the Antifederalists, a group of prominent Americans that opposed the idea of having a strong central government and a loose interpretation of the Constitution, as the Federalists like Alexander Hamilton supported.

Jefferson and the Antifederalists supported the states having many rights and the strict interpretation of the Constitution. These two sides discussed and negotiated the terms of the new Constitution through the delegates that participated in the Constitutional Convention of 1787, held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Federalist.

A federalist was the American politician that supported the creation of a strong central government and a loose interpretation of the Constitution. We are talking about federalists like Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and Jhon Jay.

Political leader.

A political leader is the one who has gained the power and reputation to lead a group of politicians and can exert certain pressure to make decisions.

Public supporters.

They are public people that express public support for the political ideas of one political leader, a political candidate or the platform of a political party.

Policies and Laws.

Are the regulations that are included in the United States Congress. These laws and legislation establish the way the government operates, the division of powers, rights, and obligations of teh US citizens, and more.

Republican.

A Republican is a member of the Republican Party. A Republican usually has the following characteristics. He is a conservative, supports expenditure to increase the defense of the country, does not support the increase of taxes to create social programs, and is not so open to modern liberal ideas such as gay marriage, diversity, and more.

6 0

3 years ago

Which best explains how contractionary policies can hamper economic growth

otez555 [7]

"They reduce disposable income" explains how contractionary policies can hamper economic growth

<h3>Further explanation </h3>

Disposable income is the amount of money that households have,available for spending and saving after income taxes accounted.

Expansionary fiscal policy is an increase in government expenditures, also a decrease in taxes that causes the government's budget deficit to increase or its budget surplus to decrease. In short, expansionary fiscal policy boosts economic growth by lowering interest rates.

Whereas contractionary fiscal policy is defined as a decrease in government expenditures, also an increase in taxes that causes the government's budget deficit to decrease or its budget surplus to increase. Contractionary money policy is used to combat inflation. In short, contractionary fiscal policy hamper economic growth by increasing interest rates.

Contractionary policy increases the cost of borrowing. It can decreases GDP and dampens inflation, but also leads to reduced disposable income. Another negative side effect is it makes an increase in the unemployment rate. Disposable income itself is the amount of money that households have, available for spending and saving after income taxes accounted.

<h3>Learn more</h3>

Learn more about hamper economic growth brainly.com/question/11698157

<h3>Answer details</h3>

Grade: 9

Subject: social studies

Chapter: hamper economic growth

Keywords: hamper economic growth

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A chief aim of the Constitution as drafted by the Convention was to create a government with enough power to act on a national l

kolbaska11 [484]

Answer:

The powers of each branch are enumerated in the Constitution, with powers not assigned to them reserved to the States.

3 0

2 years ago