Is it justifiable to invade a country to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons or to prevent future conflicts?

1 answer:

8 0

Well, this question cannot really be answered generally. It's a matter of judgement, and it's best judged for particular cases. The consideration of this depends on two factors:

what are the probable costs (in terms of human life, and the quality of human life) of the invasion? - it's important not to diminish these factors, as the assessments of casualties often tend to be lower than the actual numbers

how high is the risk of the alternative. Do we have a good, unbiased reason to believe that a spread of nuclear weapons (unchecked spread, or spread that gives reasons to worry. US has a lot of nuclear weapons, but since it's not planning to use them on other country, it wouldn't be justified to attach the US) will happen? what kind of conflict are we risking?

in any case, this is not an easy question, and perhaps there will never be a good answer for it.

You might be interested in

In Society in America, __________ examined religion, politics, child rearing, slavery, and immigration to the United States, pay

Yuki888 [10]

You’re answer would be Jane Addams love!

7 0

2 years ago

Justin has three projects due next week. He is frustrated because he just knows all the professors make their due dates the same

larisa86 [58]

Answer: External locus of control

Explanation: There is an internal and external locus of control, and Justin has an external locus. Those people who tie their work, success or failure exclusively to their own efforts, regardless of external factors, have an internal locus of control.

Unlike them, Justin attributes his successes, or failure in this case, to external influences, specifically because of the conspiracy of three teachers to give the same due dates, and therefore he has an external locus of control. Simply put, Justin and others like him tend to blame others for their own failures. In the case of the success of people with external locus of control, this success can be attributed to luck, fate, the circumstances of the environment, and even divine intervention.

3 0

2 years ago

Who was Pratap Singh shah? Why couldn't he continue the unification for a long?

Liula [17]

Pratap Singh Shah was the king of the Nepal. He couldn't continue the unification so long because of the political obstacles.

<h3>When did Pratap Singh Shah became king?</h3>

Pratap Singh Shah became the ruler of Nepal in 1775. Pratap Singh Shah ruled for for 36 months, from 1777 to 1779, before passing away at the age of 26 from natural causes. Rana Bahadur Shah, his two-year-old son, succeeded him.

He couldn't unify the territories of the nation because he did not actively participated in the process of the unification like his father who was greatly involved and political crises also didn't allowed to do so.

Learn more about unification here:

brainly.com/question/4979723

#SPJ1

5 0

1 year ago

The four categories of labor

Alina [70]

Answer:The four major categories of labor are based on the general level of knowledge and skills needed to do a particular kind of job. These categories are unskilled, semiskilled, skilled and professional.

Explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did geography lead to historical and cultural differences between nations?

Nikitich [7]

Geography has an influence on the:
- natural resources, which can determine richness of a nation
- the contacts with other culture that it has.

For example, island nations can be more isolationist- then can defend themselves better and they have a limited contact with other nations.

3 0

2 years ago