1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Helen [10]
3 years ago
6

Is it justifiable to invade a country to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons or to prevent future conflicts?

Social Studies
1 answer:
Fiesta28 [93]3 years ago
8 0
Well, this question cannot really be answered generally. It's a matter of judgement, and it's best judged for particular cases. The consideration of this depends on two factors:

what are the probable costs (in terms of human life, and the quality of human life) of the invasion? - it's important not to diminish these factors, as the assessments of casualties often tend to  be lower than the actual numbers

how high is the risk of the alternative. Do we have a good, unbiased reason to believe that a spread of nuclear weapons (unchecked spread, or spread that gives reasons to worry. US has a lot of nuclear weapons, but since it's not planning to use them on other country, it wouldn't be justified to attach the US) will happen? what kind of conflict are we risking?

in any case, this is not an easy question, and perhaps there will never be a good answer for it.
You might be interested in
Angela transfers to a new high school for gifted children and has trouble making friends. she expected this and plans to change
Katyanochek1 [597]
<span>Actually in this scenario, Angela mainly experiences a great social platforms outside the school, where she could meet and chat with different types of peoples with different natures and behaviours with full freedom, and also she can share some of her feelings with others, there by she can feel busy socially in between many peoples, so there by she has found this effective options for dealing all her stress.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Which one of these is NOT a strength of the Articles of Confederation?
allochka39001 [22]

Answer:

your answer would be a congress could not sign treaties. It's in your explanation says Congress had no power to Levy taxes or regulate trade without federal court system executive leaders that one was not a strength of the Articles of the Confederation

Explanation:

There were more weaknesses than strengths under the Articles of Confederation. The lack of power given to the Continental Congress strangled the federal government. The Articles gave Congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws. If a state did not support a federal law, that state could simply ignore it. Congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade. Without a federal court system or executive leader, there would be no way to enforce these laws, either. Amending the Articles of Confederation would also require a unanimous decision, which would be extremely difficult.

5 0
3 years ago
A researcher developed a new intelligence test for elementary school children. However, the researcher fears that the scores fro
BARSIC [14]

Answer: Discriminant validity

Explanation:

Discriminant Validity

Discriminant validity means a researcher needs to display or show that those variables that are not correlated are indeed not correlated in real life or practically .

For example the test above is measuring intelligence rather than reading ability so the researcher can use discriminant validity to actual show that reading ability is not related to intelligence and that the test is solely measuring intelligence.

He should show the evidence that there is really a low correlation between these two measures.

5 0
3 years ago
Can you help me please
zhuklara [117]
9) is a loan and that’s your answer
4 0
3 years ago
2. Who is John Marshall? What important decisions did John Marshall make?
irina1246 [14]

Answer:

Marshall served on the Supreme Court up until his death in 1835. He is widely considered the most important and influential Supreme Court justice in U.S. history. His rulings changed the way the Supreme Court worked and established it as an equal third branch of the government.

A Federalist Stronghold: John Marshall's Supreme Court. Marbury v. Madison was one of the most important decisions in U.S. judicial history, because it legitimized the ability of the Supreme Court to judge the consitutionality of acts of the president or Congress.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Whether Marina thinks positively about herself is an example of:
    14·2 answers
  • What do the letters FDIC stand for?
    5·2 answers
  • . Assume a U.S. firm buys (imports) $5 million (in U.S. dollars) of foreign goods. That transaction by itself increases the trad
    14·1 answer
  • Cores taken near the oceanic ridges show the age and thickness of the sediment increases as you move away from the ridge. This s
    8·1 answer
  • Think about how you were taught to read. what approach was used
    7·1 answer
  • During the colonial era, a major effect of the Appalachian Mountains on settlement was that the mountain range encouraged people
    10·2 answers
  • The emotional center of the brain that is activated when a person with an addiction sees a person, place, or thing that reminds
    8·1 answer
  • Explain what personal involvement in leadership means. Why is being personally involved important? What are some ways a leader c
    6·1 answer
  • "You are using material from a newspaper article. There is no author given, but the title of the article is "Was Emerson lying t
    11·1 answer
  • Which region is mostly a desert with lava built landforms and is used for wheat farming
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!