1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pav-90 [236]
3 years ago
8

Which does not explain why a large part of the Great Plains became known as the "Dust Bowl"?

History
2 answers:
Delicious77 [7]3 years ago
6 0

The correct answer is A, as the option that doesn't explain why a large part of the Great Plains became known as the Dust Bowl is that the soil of the Great Plains was too rocky to support farming, as that statement is not true. The Great Plains are a very fertile area, with land suitable for agriculture and cattle raising.



mina [271]3 years ago
3 0
The option that does not explain why a large part of the Great Plains became known as the "Dust Bowl" would be that "<span>The soil of the Great Plains was too rocky to support farming," since the soil was (usually) relatively fertile. </span>
You might be interested in
What do historians do
Sophie [7]

historians study history

7 0
3 years ago
Once the powder keg was ignited, what made it difficult to stop the chain of events that led to all-out war in Europe in 1914?
zepelin [54]

Nations responded to threats to their allies by mobilizing their militaries.

By the time that anyone took back the decision to go to war, it was already too late because militaries got ready so quickly. It was like lighting a fuse, it happens so fast, it is almost impossible to stop.

3 0
3 years ago
What did Muslims bring to Ghana in the 10th century?
Naily [24]
 <span>A. increased trade and prosperity</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain Lincoln’s stance on slavery before and after the outbreak of the civil war
umka2103 [35]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

cuz it's right.

6 0
3 years ago
If WW1 had not taken place , do you think the russian revolution would have happened? support your argument with facts.
trasher [3.6K]

Answer:

It could have possibly happened, but most likely not.

Explanation:

The key figure of the revolution was Vladimir Lenin who was in exile during WW1 and the Germans specifically sent him back to St. Petrograd to cause political instability and bring Russia out of the war. If WW1 did not happen then Lenin would have not gone back to Russia and the White Army also could focus on suppressing Communist uprisings. The monarchy was still very weak but would remain in power. The democratic reformers would try to change Russia through peaceful protest rather than violent uprising.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which president was the best while in office? And why? (Please explain)
    12·1 answer
  • How did the United States get supplies to West berliners after Stalin blocked off the West?
    15·1 answer
  • Which contributed to the outbreak of ww1
    9·1 answer
  • Under Eisenhower and Dulles, America's policy of brinksmanship included:
    10·2 answers
  • Of the following, whose contribution was most significant to the emerging American identity? Charles Townshend, John Dickenson,
    7·2 answers
  • If God made the universe, then who made him
    12·2 answers
  • True or false After industrialization, workers’ tasks changed.
    9·2 answers
  • How could the declaration of independence lead to political revolutions
    6·1 answer
  • I NEED THE CORRECT ANSWER TO THIS ASAP FOR A TEST PLEASE!!!!! A local pond in Orange County has become a breeding ground for mos
    15·2 answers
  • According to the chart, in which profession did most women work?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!