Answer:
i. The training method was on-the-job training.
ii. Christine's performance error was stereotyping.
Explanation: On-the-job training is a learning process in which a worker is trained on how to perform certain tasks by actually doing those tasks, where an experienced colleague, supervisor or manager will usually serve as the trainer.
Stereotyping is the act for generalizing a particular category of people, it is having an expectation of a person or group of persons that they might behave or act in a certain way.
Christine in the scenario above, has ranked Jon using a stereotype that he is young new to the job, therefore that is the reason why he did not perform well or up to standard.
Answer:
D. Neither country could gain from trade with each other because neither one has a comparative advantage
Explanation:
Opportunity cost refers to the units sacrificed from production of one good to produce an extra unit of another good.
In the given case, the number of workers are same.
The opportunity cost for producing corn instead of oats by Cornland would be : 10/40 units of oats = 0.4 units of oats
Similarly, the opportunity cost for producing corn by Oatland = 5/ 20 = 0.4 units of oats
Similarly, the opportunity cost for producing oats by Cornland = 4 units of corn
Opportunity cost for producing oats by Oatland = 4 units of corn.
As can be seen, none of the two i.e Cornland or Oatland enjoys a comparative advantage over other since for both, the opportunity cost is the same.
Hence, neither country would gain out of trade.
<em>Most simply, the formula for the equilibrium level of income is when aggregate supply (AS) is equal to aggregate demand (AD), where AS = AD. Adding a little complexity, the formula becomes Y = C + I + G, where Y is aggregate income, C is consumption, I is investment expenditure, and G is government expenditure.</em>
