Answer:
{Hello Kirito here! I believe the answer is-}
The book The Hypnotists written by Gordon Korman is a book about a boy named Jax who has color changing eyes which can hypnotise people. Jax is not able to control his powers so he literally hypnotising people by accident. The only person who was immune to this effect was Tommy because he was color blind.
Hope this helps
Answer:
The correct answer is B.
Explanation:
The excerpt from Tinker v. Des Moines that shows how precedent helps support an argument is: "Other cases cited by the Court do not, as implied, follow the McReynolds reasonableness doctrine. West Virginia v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, clearly rejecting the 'reasonableness' test, held that the Fourteenth Amendment made the First applicable to the States". This excerpt shows how the Supreme Court uses decisions of other cases already resolved to support arguments within cases in decision at the moment .In the present case, the Court uses the precedent West Virginia v. Barnette, in which the doctrine of "reasonableness" of McReynolds is not admitted, to apply it to the case Tinker v. Des Moines.
Question 1) The answer is A. The description of the mother’s love as “a river” coveys its abundance, and the mentioning that that it’s “inside me still” suggests that it’s never ending. This is especially clear when compared with B and C, neither of which fit the sentence as much as A.
Question 2) The answer is C. The sentence compared the usefulness of the assembly instructions to a camel in the Arctic. A camel, obviously, would not fare very well in a climate like the Arctic. The answer A is possible, but there is nothing in the sentence that suggests that the instructions were specifically not in English. Therefore, it can be most logically inferred that the instructions were not very helpful.
The answer is:
kill himself