The weather at that point was bright and sunny. He described how positive the people were around him and how their positive was infecting him. This is quite the opposite of what Shelley sets the novel. The theme of the novel is supposed dark and gloomy.
Hi there!
Question 1: The answer to this question is A) Boring tone.
The author is an exaggerated writing style while inferring the shadow was under his arms as he moved his steps and this tends to be confusing and the boring tone is automatically inferred.
Question 2: The answer is letter A) It conveys the idea the city council members feel guilty about their actions.
The author uses imagery in this excerpt, this is a descriptive language that is used to appeal the reader's senses. With the wide description of the situation catches the attention of the franchisers and the rest of the city population that they feel guilty for leaving him.
Question 3: The answer is letter C) It allows the reader to recognize the humor in the poem.
The line breaks affect the poem in many different ways, as the reader goes along the poem he can notice that if you read word-by-word, each one of them does not have any individual sense, that is why it brings some humor to the poem.
Question 4: The answer is letter A) It helps create an admiring tone, suggesting that the speaker approves of the heats strength.
The personification literature figure gives human attributions to animals or inanimate objects, and in this poem, the rhetorical figure creates an admiring tone discovering the powerful heat.
Question 5: The answer is letter D) The wind represents new life, which can grow thanks to the heat of the sun.
In "Heat", the symbolic meaning of the wind represents the power it has in collaboration with the sun, how they can both help to construct something in the environment or to do something for a specific object.
simple sentence- Carrie whistled for Sassy, her cocker spaniel. Sassy came bounding down the stairs.
compound sentence- Carrie whistled for Sassy, her cocker spaniel, and Sassy came bounding down the stairs.
Answer: A. "full of pollutants"
Explanation:
A would be the Pollute-tion
B would be the Pollute-able
C would be the Pollute
D would be Pollute-er
Brazelton curve
It all started in 1962, when Dr. T. Berry Brazelton, a renowned pediatrician and child development researcher, conducted a study of normal healthy infants by asking their parents some questions about their infant’s crying routine. In this study Dr. Brazelton found that all infants went through a stage in their development where they cried increasingly more. This crying began at about 2 weeks, peaked around six weeks of age and began decreasing around 12-16 weeks (3-4 months of age).
Twenty-four years later in 1986, two other pediatric developmental pediatricians, Dr. Urs Hunziker and Dr. Ronald Barr replicated Dr. Brazelton’s study. Their research of normal healthy infants in Montreal, Canada found the exact same results as Dr. Brazelton had. There have been several other studies done since that validate this normal crying curve of infants in the first few months of age.
This is an important discovery because the assumption for years was that if your baby cried excessively they had "Colic"" leading parents and caregivers to believe there was something wrong or abnormal with their baby. Extensive research now tells us that all infants go through a stage of increased crying, although some may cry a lot more than others. This crying is not an indication that there is something wrong with the baby but rather a normal developmental stage in all babies lives. You’ll notice on the simplified graph to the right that the crying starts to increase at about 2 weeks of age, peaks in the second month of life and then gets less at about 4-5 months. It is very important to remember that all babies go through this but some cry a lot, 5 or more hours, and some far less, only 30 minutes in a day/night.
So, the question remains, how do we know crying is the reason a person becomes so frustrated that they shake an infant? Certainly, we know that many have confessed after they shook their infant saying things like “I just could not stand the crying anymore", or “He would not stop crying so I shook him.” Cases like these are an indication that frustration with crying is certainly a reason someone shakes an infant, but is it the primary reason?
