I say around 15-25 yrs but really i am not sure just being honest
<span>Albert's 19-year old son, paul, lived with him all year. paul is a full-time student who earned $4500, which he put into a college fund. albert can claim paul as a dependent</span>
Answer:
Option (a) is correct.
Explanation:
Contribution margin per marketing plan = Sales - Variable cost
= $3,000 - $2,000
= $1,000
A.
(1) 

Break even in marketing plan = 400
(2) Break-even in dollars:
= Break-even in marketing plan × Average rate per plan
= 400 × 3,000
= 1,200,000
(3) Margin of safety = Actual sales - Break-even sales in dollars
= 1,500,000 - 1,200,000
= 300,000


= 20%
B.
(1) Contribution margin per marketing plan = Sales - Variable cost
= $4,000 - $2,000
= $2,000


Break even in marketing plan = 200
(2) Break-even in dollars:
= Break-even in marketing plan × Average rate per plan
= 200 × 4,000
= 800,000
(3) Margin of safety = Actual sales - Break-even sales in dollars
= 1,500,000 - 800,000
= 700,000


= 47%
Therefore, option (a) would achieve the margin of safety ratio more than 45%.
Answer:
e. Sunk cost.
Explanation:
As per the given statement, the best appropriate option is sunk cost. As the sunk cost deals with the past cost which is already incurred in the past and it cannot be changed or avoided, neither it can be recovered. Example - Rent expense.
Plus it does not affect the future decisions that means it is irrelevant for decision-making aspects.
Based on the information given the current ratio is:1.4.
<h3>Current ratio</h3>
Using this formula
Current ratio=Current assets/Current liabilites
Where:
Current assets=$191,800
Current liabilities=$137,000
Let plug in the formula
Current ratio=$191,800/$137,000
Current ratio = 1.4
Inconclusion the current ratio is:1.4.
Learn more about current ratio here:brainly.com/question/2686492