<u>Original Question</u><u><em>: What is the significance of the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887?</em></u>
<u></u>
<u>Answer: Choice (B)</u> or <u>The act established some of the first steps to allow congress to regulate interstate trade</u>
<u></u>
<u></u>
<em>Reason:</em>
- <em>Choice (A) is incorrect because these laws were set up to regulate industries, not to ban certain monopolies</em>
- <em>Choice (B) is correct because it was the first attempt by the government to implement rules to prevent railroads from setting up outlandish prices</em>
- <em>Choice (C) is incorrect because this act didn't have any relation with the Apache Indians</em>
- <em>Choice (D) is incorrect because this wasn't the first time that the US set up a law that influenced the economy</em>
<em />
Hope that helps!
I might me wrong but i think it is Spain sorry if Im wrong
Answer: Albeit the Founding Fathers never planned it to be like this, partisanship and a two party framework are critical pieces of US legislative issues since they take into consideration "groups to be shaped"- - groups that can more readily get across specific thoughts and party stages to general society.
Since there are just two significant gatherings, US residents feel that they just host a decision between one get-together or the other.
Since there are just two significant gatherings, the gatherings will in general differ enormously on many issues, taking possibly one outrageous side of the contention or the other.
On occasion, there have been endeavors to make a suitable outsider, yet these gatherings infrequently have sufficient help to be on an equivalent balance with the two fundamental gatherings.
<span>He spread his power throughout the nation and called for his absolute rule. He strengthened the Catholic Church and had a sea battle using the armada with England over the gold they were bringing back from mexico.
5) </span><span>During Philip II's reign he expanded Spanish influence, stregthened the Catholic Church, and made his own power absolute. He was like his father hard working, devoluted, and ambitious. Unlike others, Philip spent most of his time on government work. He never jousted and would sometimes hunt. He made every part of the government responsible to himself. He controlled as an absoulte monarch with complete control over his government and the lives of the people.
Hope this helps!</span>