Answer:
[B] Only State A and State B can take action against Bill.
Explanation:
This is because the whole details of the transaction took place between State A and State B. This is why the states involved can take action against Bill. If not, then all the States would have had the right to take action against Bill.
This analysis validates that Only State A and State B would be able to take action against Bill.
The answer is B.
B. Duty of Confidentiality
<em>Hope this helps!!</em>
<em>:))</em>
Answer:
Concrete operational stage
Explanation:
The concrete operational stage is the third stage of Piaget's theory of cognitive development, predating the formal operational stage (12 and above) and arriving after the preoperational stage (2-7 years old). During this stage, children are able to make logical conclusions in terms of the things they can experience with their senses. Some examples would be noticing that rain comes down from the sky, which is a form of inductive thinking.
However, children at this age group are not yet able to think in a more abstract manner - which is why their deductive thinking abilities are not yet as well-refined as its inductive thinking ones.
Answer:Weak,Inductive,Uncogent
Explanation:This tries to compare Sierra Nevada mountain range and the island of Jamaica are both popular tourist destinations.
The conclusion made by this statement is WEAK, INDUCTIVE AND UNCOGENT.
The information about the bringing of Ski equipment when traveling to Jamaica in February is not a strong, deductive and cogent conclusion as both areas are not exactly the same as stated by the write up.
A conclusion is said to be weak when it does not have strong evidence to back it up,it is said to be inductive if it is not fully supported by the premise and it is said to be Uncogent when the argument is not clear and believable.