Answer:
Although Michael broke the law from Negative Traits, Micheal is still responsible for his actions, he knows from right from wrong. Therfore charges should stand.
Explanation:
The FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) (Rule 26)
The FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) is a requirement for the expert witness. If the expert fails to include this, then there is a high chance that the testimony can be thrown out.
I hope this helps! :)
<h3>What is the "first consideration" for policymakers?</h3>
<em>Answer</em><em>;</em><em> </em>
<h3>Lavis JN, Gilbert R, Salanti G, Harden M, See S. Infant sleeping position and the sudden infant death syndrome: systematic review of observational studies and historical review of recommendations from 1940 to 2002. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34:874–87. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi08</h3>
<h3><em>Hope</em><em> </em><em>it's</em><em> </em><em>helpful</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>you</em></h3>
Answer:
there isn't anything showing. I can't help if I can't see the actual problem.
